2003
DOI: 10.1080/1368282031000154204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: a critical review

Abstract: Research in this area has covered mostly prosodic expression, although some more recent studies cover comprehension, processing and the relationship of receptive prosodic ability to theory of mind. Findings conflict and methodology varies greatly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
200
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
200
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Pitch is used to convey intonational and pragmatic meanings at the utterance level rather than lexical meanings at the word level (Cruttenden, 1997;Wennerstrom, 2001). Taken to an extreme, speakers of intonation languages may communicate word meanings effectively with minimal or even inappropriate use of pitch contours, as seen, for example, in autism spectrum disorders (McCann & Peppé, 2003).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitch is used to convey intonational and pragmatic meanings at the utterance level rather than lexical meanings at the word level (Cruttenden, 1997;Wennerstrom, 2001). Taken to an extreme, speakers of intonation languages may communicate word meanings effectively with minimal or even inappropriate use of pitch contours, as seen, for example, in autism spectrum disorders (McCann & Peppé, 2003).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible hypothesis is that lack of hemispheric specialization may contribute to reduced abilities in right hemisphere-specialized tasks as well, which include processing the prosodic, emotional, and melodic aspects of language, and interpreting figurative meanings in language, humor, and metaphor (Toga and Thompson, 2003). Behavioral studies report deficits in these skills in autism (e.g., McCann and Peppe, 2003), which suggests that further study may be warranted in this area.…”
Section: Lateralization and Behavioral Impairment In Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that typically developing children appear to consider the presence of intonation as a crucial feature that distinguishes human speech from robot speech. Children with ASD have been reported to produce atypical intonation, which has been variably described as sounding Brobotic,^Bmonotone,^Boverprecise,^or Bsing-song^( [18] and references therein), and have difficulties with using intonation appropriately in communication [40]. However, children with ASD may show strong pitch discrimination capacities in both speech and non-speech material [43] and can make use of intonational information to process syntactically ambiguous sentences [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%