2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-018-9411-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic end-weight reflects phrasal stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight based on onset sonority is attested in various metrical systems, including prosodic end-weight, metrics, textsetting, and stress. First, low sonority onsets are treated as heavier than high sonority onsets in prosodic end-weight, in which heavier syllables are generally preferred in final position (Cooper & Ross 1975, Campbell & Anderson 1976), one explanation being that that is the locus of greater stress (Ryan 2019a). Syllable weight in end-weight is a function not just of the nucleus and coda, where greater length and sonority contribute to greater weight, as they normally do, but also a function of the onset, where less sonority contributes to greater weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight based on onset sonority is attested in various metrical systems, including prosodic end-weight, metrics, textsetting, and stress. First, low sonority onsets are treated as heavier than high sonority onsets in prosodic end-weight, in which heavier syllables are generally preferred in final position (Cooper & Ross 1975, Campbell & Anderson 1976), one explanation being that that is the locus of greater stress (Ryan 2019a). Syllable weight in end-weight is a function not just of the nucleus and coda, where greater length and sonority contribute to greater weight, as they normally do, but also a function of the onset, where less sonority contributes to greater weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main claim behind the association of EW to phonology, and specifically prosody, is that there is an optimal alignment of heavier constituents and prosodic focus; constituents that pattern as heavy, are preferred closer to the right edge so as to coincide with the most prominent point of the prosodic phrase: nuclear stress (Selkirk 1995). This alignment encompasses the prosodically motivated manifestation of EW in particular, named Prosodic End-weight (Ryan 2019a) (here used interchangeably with EW) and seems to be in accord with other manifestations of the stress-weight interface (Gordon 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The phenomenon of End-weight (henceforth EW) refers to the tendency of heavy or complex constituents to be found closer to the right edge of a phrase or sentence. While the first reference to EW (Quirk et al 1972) was not within a phonological framework, more recent studies interpret the phenomenon as crucially associated with phonology, especially in the domain of constituent ordering within clauses (Anttila 2008, Anttila et al 2010) and that of binomials (Ryan 2019a). The main claim behind the association of EW to phonology, and specifically prosody, is that there is an optimal alignment of heavier constituents and prosodic focus; constituents that pattern as heavy, are preferred closer to the right edge so as to coincide with the most prominent point of the prosodic phrase: nuclear stress (Selkirk 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of linguistics, the definition of the stress, as Robert Ladd holds, is always used as "supersegment feature of fundamental frequency, duration and intensity" [1]. Mispronunciation of English sentence stress is always a striking phenomenon which exists and should be paid more attention to avoid the "Foreign accent" [2]. Incorrect placement of sentence stress will be detrimental to the comprehensible message which the speaker intends to convey and to the understanding in utterance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%