2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic Adaptation in Language Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The F 0 region provides acoustic information for imitation exploited in promoting social convergence and status accommodation (Gregory and Hoyt, 1982; Gregory, 1983; Gregory et al, 1993; Gregory and Webster, 1996; Gregory et al, 1997; Haas and Gregory, 2005; Pardo, 2006) and expressing ingroup–outgroup bias (Babel, 2009; Pardo et al, 2012). Speakers who are perceived as attractive, likable and/or dominant influence listeners' pitch output, and pitch convergence can be seen as an indicator of cooperative behavior in communication dyads (Nilsenová and Swerts, 2012; Okada et al, 2012). Pitch divergence, on the other hand, suggests that speakers may wish to be viewed as dissimilar and increase social distance between themselves (Giles, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F 0 region provides acoustic information for imitation exploited in promoting social convergence and status accommodation (Gregory and Hoyt, 1982; Gregory, 1983; Gregory et al, 1993; Gregory and Webster, 1996; Gregory et al, 1997; Haas and Gregory, 2005; Pardo, 2006) and expressing ingroup–outgroup bias (Babel, 2009; Pardo et al, 2012). Speakers who are perceived as attractive, likable and/or dominant influence listeners' pitch output, and pitch convergence can be seen as an indicator of cooperative behavior in communication dyads (Nilsenová and Swerts, 2012; Okada et al, 2012). Pitch divergence, on the other hand, suggests that speakers may wish to be viewed as dissimilar and increase social distance between themselves (Giles, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stage is the "prosody of speech" stage. During this period, the research on the interface between discourse and prosody focused on the role of prosody in the transmission of emotion (Couper-Kuhlen, 1986;Culpeper, Derek, & Wichmann, 2003;Nilsenova & Swerts, 2012) and the function of constructing communicative context (House, 2006;Wilson & Wharton, 2006). The former has demonstrated through numerous experiments that different discourse emotions have corresponding rhythmic intonation in regular situations, e.g., native English-speaking judges always use decreasing pitch as a way to convey the emotion of justice and solemnity in their judgments, while native English-speaking speakers who join a new context always use increasing pitch in the opening sentence as a rhythmic strategy to increase their likelihood of popularity.…”
Section: The Development Of Studies On Pragmatic Prosodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to correctly perceive pitch in another’s speech and to adapt one’s pitch according to one’s goals is an essential communicative and social skill (Communication Accommodation Theory; [ 51 – 55 ]). Pitch convergence may then be an indicator of awareness towards one’s environment and of desire for social approval and acceptance [ 56 59 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%