2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosocial norms in the classroom: The role of self-regulation in following norms of giving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With that said, it is important to note that several features of our task have been shown to increase equal sharing in prior research; more specifically, we used a motivating task in which children distributed discrete countable resources that could be distributed via one‐to‐one correspondence (Frydman & Bryant, ), resources were distributed in the presence of the experimenter (Engelmann et al., ; Leimgruber et al., ), and children distributed after having had the chance to interact with the recipient (Chernyak & Kushnir, ; Hamann, Warneken, Greenberg, & Tomsello, ; Warneken, Lohse, Melis, & Tomasello, ) and sympathize with the recipient's distress (Vaish, Carpenter, & Tomasello, ). Moreover, children were tested in a culture in which children are known to care about fairness and even sacrifice resources in order to achieve it (Blake et al., ; Shaw & Olson, ). Each of these motivational and situational factors may have played a role in inspiring children to be generous towards the puppet in spite of their self‐interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With that said, it is important to note that several features of our task have been shown to increase equal sharing in prior research; more specifically, we used a motivating task in which children distributed discrete countable resources that could be distributed via one‐to‐one correspondence (Frydman & Bryant, ), resources were distributed in the presence of the experimenter (Engelmann et al., ; Leimgruber et al., ), and children distributed after having had the chance to interact with the recipient (Chernyak & Kushnir, ; Hamann, Warneken, Greenberg, & Tomsello, ; Warneken, Lohse, Melis, & Tomasello, ) and sympathize with the recipient's distress (Vaish, Carpenter, & Tomasello, ). Moreover, children were tested in a culture in which children are known to care about fairness and even sacrifice resources in order to achieve it (Blake et al., ; Shaw & Olson, ). Each of these motivational and situational factors may have played a role in inspiring children to be generous towards the puppet in spite of their self‐interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active equal resource distribution, unlike knowledge of social norms, may require the coordination of advanced behavioral and cognitive abilities that children are still developing. Indeed, recent work has indicated that children's sharing behavior might be linked with socio‐cognitive abilities that develop during the preschool years, such as theory of mind (Moore & Macgillivray, ), self‐regulation (Blake, Piovesan, Monitnari, Warneken, & Gino, ), cognitive control (Steinbeis, ), and prospective reasoning (Sebastián‐Enesco & Warneken, ). Moreover, prior work has found correlations between such socio‐cognitive abilities and moral reasoning more generally (Astington, ; Lane, Wellman, Olson, LaBounty, & Kerr, ; Smetana, Jambon, Conry‐Murray, & Sturge‐Apple, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active participants have less time available for deviant conducts (Hirschi 1969). Sharing objects and resources with schoolmates is a common social practice which enables them to socialize, create social bonds, strengthen friendships, and share experience (Blake et al 2015;Gentina 2014). We follow Hawdon's (1999) view and consider involvement in social activities through the practice of sharing objects with schoolmates.…”
Section: Peer Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los comportamientos prosociales poseen numerosos vínculos con otras habilidades y comportamientos no cognitivos, como la autoeficacia (Caprara y Steca, 2005), la autoestima (Afolabi, 2014), el afrontamiento (De Boo y Wicherts, 2009) y la autorregulación (Blake, Piovesan, Montinari, Warneken y Gino, 2015). Las relaciones entre estas habilidades y comportamientos y los comportamientos sociales son complejas y recíprocas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified