2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.27.119354
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRosettaC: Rosetta based modeling of PROTAC mediated ternary complexes

Abstract: Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), which induce degradation by recruitment of an E3 ligase to a target protein, are gaining much interest as a new pharmacological modality. However, designing PROTACs is challenging. Formation of a ternary complex between the protein target, the PROTAC and the recruited E3 ligase is considered paramount for successful degradation. A structural model of this ternary complex could in principle inform rational PROTAC design. Unfortunately, only a handful of structures are a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group epitope mapping is a well-established method and has proven reliable in determining solvent exposed positions in a range of VHL ligands [155]. Computational modelling of the TC as an alternative to experimental techniques to inform rational design is also likely to see significant expansion in the future, and an increasing number of groups are developing methods to do this [156,157]. The continued development of TC modelling may provide avenues for linker development in lieu of significant empirical experimental optimisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group epitope mapping is a well-established method and has proven reliable in determining solvent exposed positions in a range of VHL ligands [155]. Computational modelling of the TC as an alternative to experimental techniques to inform rational design is also likely to see significant expansion in the future, and an increasing number of groups are developing methods to do this [156,157]. The continued development of TC modelling may provide avenues for linker development in lieu of significant empirical experimental optimisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally, some true positives are grouped in a cluster separate from the largest double cluster -for example, for 6HR2, 16 crystal-like poses do not belong to the largest double cluster (15 belong to the 4 th -largest cluster, and one is a singleton) -and thus these desirable true positive results are discarded when only the largest double cluster is considered. While it is certainly possible to evaluate smaller double clusters as well, as has been done elsewhere, 42 unless additional experimental information is available for use to evaluate these clusters, it seems likely that more noise than signal will generally result from this more expansive approach. Moreover, as can be seen in (Table 1), whereas the accompanying darker bars show the populations within the largest L3xP10 double cluster.…”
Section: Validation Of Methods 4bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019 we reported 41 a suite of computational modeling tools to facilitate PROTAC design, thus enabling the cost-and time-saving advantages of an iterative design campaign guided by in silico modeling results. The goal of our original work was to develop a generally applicable PROTAC modeling protocol, i.e., one that could give accurate results across different protein targets, E3 ligases, and linkers; such an approach had been absent from the literature at that time, with all previous PROTAC modeling studies limited to a specific TPD system (although preprints following our model have recently appeared 42,43 ). To that end, we established "Method 4" as the most accurate approach for both VHL-and cereblon-based PROTACs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,[22][23][24][25] Previous work to computationally predict ternary structures mostly consists of protein-protein docking protocols, perhaps followed by refinement of the initial structures with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to assess the stability of the predicted models. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, these docking protocols fail to predict high-resolution structures (sub-2.0Å) with high fidelity. That is, while protein-protein docking protocols have shown some promise in generating structural models of ternary complexes with reasonable resolution (often characterized as sub-10Å RMSD to an x-ray structure), the best structures typically fall somewhere within a long list of possible poses (often in the hundreds or thousands), demonstrating the challenge associated with the selection of high-accuracy ternary structure models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%