2022
DOI: 10.1159/000528342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pros and Cons of Current Diagnostic Tools for Risk-Based Screening of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents with Overweight or Obesity

Abstract: It is still a matter of debate which is the most suitable diagnostic test for risk-based screening of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. This review highlighted benefits and pitfalls of currently recommended screening tools (Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)). The greatest advantage of OGTT is the ability to detect people with impaired glucose tolerance, a subcategory at high-risk of devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Routinely testing HbA1c at the point of care should be encouraged since it allows identifying young individuals at risk of T2D that otherwise would be missed. Indeed, children with HbA1c values greater than 5.7% showed a sevenfold (girls)/fourfold (boys) increased risk of developing T2D in adulthood [ 72 ].…”
Section: Screening For Prediabetes and T2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Routinely testing HbA1c at the point of care should be encouraged since it allows identifying young individuals at risk of T2D that otherwise would be missed. Indeed, children with HbA1c values greater than 5.7% showed a sevenfold (girls)/fourfold (boys) increased risk of developing T2D in adulthood [ 72 ].…”
Section: Screening For Prediabetes and T2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, we continue to use diagnostic tests and threshold values that are derived from epidemiological evidence in adult populations, while it is still debated what test is the most suitable in clinical practice. Recently, Garonzi et al have proposed a practical flow chart for the clinical use of screening tools in young individuals, taking into account pros and cons of each test [ 72 ]. They suggest starting to screen by testing FPG and HbA1c in the same fasting blood draw, as a first level examination.…”
Section: Screening For Prediabetes and T2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicitly, their position is neither for nor against screening prediabetes. Pediatricians and health care providers should continue to use their clinical judgement in deciding whether or not screening is warranted[ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Prediabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite most authorities proposing risk-based screening, the optimal or the best strategy remains a matter of debate[ 43 , 62 ]. According to the latest ADA and ISPAD recommendations, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h plasma glucose level measured during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) can be used to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes in childhood and adolescence[ 48 , 70 ].…”
Section: Prediabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of the HbA1c test has gone beyond determination of diabetes control to include diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [ 3 - 5 ]. However, there is still some clarity required on the superiority of HbA1c in the screening for diabetes and prediabetes [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%