1974
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1974.01630040016003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propyl Gallate-Contact Sensitization and Orally-Induced Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are usually cheilitis and dermatitis of the hands. Previous exposure and orally induced tolerance, may explained the low rates of allergic contact dermatitis to propyl gallate (Kahn, 1974). Due to this potential, it has been recommended to limit its concentration in cosmetics (Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel, 2007).…”
Section: Sensitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are usually cheilitis and dermatitis of the hands. Previous exposure and orally induced tolerance, may explained the low rates of allergic contact dermatitis to propyl gallate (Kahn, 1974). Due to this potential, it has been recommended to limit its concentration in cosmetics (Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel, 2007).…”
Section: Sensitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patch testing with a 20% solution in 70% ethanol resulted in pruritus and erythema in 5 of 10 healthy volunteers (Kahn et al 1974). Patch testing with a 20% solution in 70% ethanol resulted in pruritus and erythema in 5 of 10 healthy volunteers (Kahn et al 1974).…”
Section: Jo22 Dermatological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitisation appears to occur rarely in patients with normal, intact skin (Cusano et al 1987). Conversely, prior oral feedings to guinea pigs produced tolerance to the sensitising effects and may explain the scarcity of reported cases in humans (Kahn et al 1974). Sensitisation presumably occurred from prior oral ingestion.…”
Section: Jo22 Dermatological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Unfortunately, five of ten test subjects developed erythema and pruritu s and the authors (Hakn et al) felt it was unsuitable for general u se. 49 Fusaro and Runge reported the use of a topical agent that gave photoprotection by a chemical reaction with keratin. 50 Three percent dihydroxyacetone in a 50 % isopropyl alcohol-water vehicle, and 0.25 % naphthoquinone in a similar carrier, were applied separately for several days until the skin achieved a tanned color; they were then applied as needed to maintain protection.…”
Section: Chemical Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%