2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propulsion options for very low Earth orbit microsatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is required to keep the maximum input magnitude in the order of 1 mm/s 2 , for the given initial condition. This value is compatible with the characteristics of missions equipped with low-thrust propulsion technologies [44,45].…”
Section: Rendezvous Case Studysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It is required to keep the maximum input magnitude in the order of 1 mm/s 2 , for the given initial condition. This value is compatible with the characteristics of missions equipped with low-thrust propulsion technologies [44,45].…”
Section: Rendezvous Case Studysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Nonetheless, we assume that the changes generated by these effects can be neglected in order to simplify the modeling. Then, the mass flow going through the nozzle is given by (3). The second and third assumptions might be compensated by multiplying the mass flow rate by a discharge coefficient that can be experimentally measured for the specific device [11].…”
Section: B Vaporizing Liquid Microthruster 1) Nozzle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A micropropulsion system is able to provide thrust in the levels from nanonewtons to micronewtons, which perfectly matches the requirements imposed by these classes of satellites. The integration of such a device into the bus of the spacecraft will represent a great technological advancement allowing them to execute precise attitude control or orbital maneuvers, thus extending the range of application of these spacecraft to include missions that involve space debris removal, orbit transfer, and so on [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority do not have a propulsion system. There have been many proposed propulsion system designs for this type of satellite [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] but most are laboratory designs and very little has been demonstrated or reported in "real" space missions. One reason for this is the many restrictions imposed on the thruster designer by the small satellite form factor with the most important ones being size (∼1/3 of the satellite volume and mass) and average power available to the payload (∼1 W).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%