Abstract:Las áreas rurales han experimentado significativas transformaciones socioeconómicas en las últimas décadas, en las cuales ha sido común la competencia de los ámbitos urbanos. Actualmente constituyen espacios multifuncionales caracterizados por el desempeño de nuevas actividades, donde el patrimonio se configura como un recurso esencial en las estrategias de desarrollo territorial (local). No obstante, el diseño de proyectos de valorización requiere la identificación del valor de cada bien. El propósito del est… Show more
“…Secondly, it would be convenient to include activities related to the participation of social stakeholders, since it is fundamental to involve the community in evaluating and managing their cultural elements [118,119]. The method that has been used as the basis to design the system proposed in this study, developed in the studies by Mayordomo and Hermosilla (2020) [46] and Mayordomo, Hermosilla and Antequera (2021) [47], applies two kinds of participatory activities in various agrarian spaces: surveys among the local population and a panel of experts. These qualitative techniques foster strategies of participative governance and could be decisive for the future management of heritage goods [120].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a quantitative, multicriteria system made up of objective, practical parameters that enable MTASs' heritage value to be known. To design it, the basis for the method to evaluate landscape drawn up in the studies by Mayordomo and Hermosilla (2020) [46] and Mayordomo, Hermosilla and Antequera (2021) [47] has been used, which is included in a general method of evaluating cultural heritage applied to different agrarian landscapes with satisfactory results. Both studies justify the selection of criteria making up the system, chosen based on an exhaustive review of the bibliography on heritage evaluation methods, as well as a series of meetings with specialists in cultural heritage.…”
Multifunctional agrifood systems with noteworthy roots in a territory are the result of a historical yet dynamic specialization. They are present in the place’s knowledge, social connections, collective action, the organization of institutions, innovation and capital. These systems are seen in the landscape, which becomes a resource as well as cultural and environmental heritage. In this regard, it is necessary to study the significance of the many aspects of heritage and landscape in agrifood systems to suitably manage and appreciate them as a territorial resource. This study develops and applies a quantitative method with various criteria to enable the landscape values of multifunctional, territorialized agrifood systems (MTAS in Spanish) to be evaluated, paying attention to essential matters such as the process of heritage recognition and the quality of their landscapes. To do so, a method designed by the authors for evaluating landscapes has been adapted to the peculiarities that define such systems, made up of criteria such as representativeness, authenticity, ecological integrity, vulnerability, accessibility and historical, social and symbolic values. The method has been applied to an exemplary Mediterranean landscape, the agricultural gardens of Valencia, which combine features of MTAS in metropolitan and coastal flatland contexts.
“…Secondly, it would be convenient to include activities related to the participation of social stakeholders, since it is fundamental to involve the community in evaluating and managing their cultural elements [118,119]. The method that has been used as the basis to design the system proposed in this study, developed in the studies by Mayordomo and Hermosilla (2020) [46] and Mayordomo, Hermosilla and Antequera (2021) [47], applies two kinds of participatory activities in various agrarian spaces: surveys among the local population and a panel of experts. These qualitative techniques foster strategies of participative governance and could be decisive for the future management of heritage goods [120].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a quantitative, multicriteria system made up of objective, practical parameters that enable MTASs' heritage value to be known. To design it, the basis for the method to evaluate landscape drawn up in the studies by Mayordomo and Hermosilla (2020) [46] and Mayordomo, Hermosilla and Antequera (2021) [47] has been used, which is included in a general method of evaluating cultural heritage applied to different agrarian landscapes with satisfactory results. Both studies justify the selection of criteria making up the system, chosen based on an exhaustive review of the bibliography on heritage evaluation methods, as well as a series of meetings with specialists in cultural heritage.…”
Multifunctional agrifood systems with noteworthy roots in a territory are the result of a historical yet dynamic specialization. They are present in the place’s knowledge, social connections, collective action, the organization of institutions, innovation and capital. These systems are seen in the landscape, which becomes a resource as well as cultural and environmental heritage. In this regard, it is necessary to study the significance of the many aspects of heritage and landscape in agrifood systems to suitably manage and appreciate them as a territorial resource. This study develops and applies a quantitative method with various criteria to enable the landscape values of multifunctional, territorialized agrifood systems (MTAS in Spanish) to be evaluated, paying attention to essential matters such as the process of heritage recognition and the quality of their landscapes. To do so, a method designed by the authors for evaluating landscapes has been adapted to the peculiarities that define such systems, made up of criteria such as representativeness, authenticity, ecological integrity, vulnerability, accessibility and historical, social and symbolic values. The method has been applied to an exemplary Mediterranean landscape, the agricultural gardens of Valencia, which combine features of MTAS in metropolitan and coastal flatland contexts.
“…Para Mayordomo Maya y Hermosilla Pla se deberán evaluar los valores intrínsecos de un bien según las pautas de representatividad, autenticidad e integridad; los valores patrimoniales en sí atendiendo a criterios históricos, sociales, simbólicos, artísticos, técnicos, territoriales, paisajísticos y divulgativos y por último los valores potenciales o de viabilidad en función de niveles de concientización, participación, rentabilidad socioeconómica y vulnerabilidad. (Mayordomo Maya & Hermosilla Pla, 2020) Sin pretender agotar la cuestión ciertamente difícil de las pautas de evaluación de los bienes culturales, es importante remarcar la imperiosa necesidad de adoptar un conjunto de pautas, medianamente sistemático, que aporte método científico a una tarea que por años se omitió o bien se basó en erráticos criterios personales.…”
Section: El Panorama Actual: Certezas Vs Desconcierto 31 La Valoración De Los Bienesunclassified
La conservación del patrimonio construido ha implicado desde siempre el desafío de afrontar herramientas de gestión y estrategias técnicas eficaces a los fines de hacer posibles las acciones necesarias para su concreción. En los últimos tiempos, la realidad económica de Latinoamérica, el rol zigzagueante del estado frente a su deber en la conservación, combinados con cierta pérdida o menoscabo del conocimiento, teórico y empírico, de las técnicas tradicionales de construcción y reparación, han resultado obstáculos, difíciles de sortear, en la gestión y preservación del patrimonio. La presencia de los obstáculos mencionados en la gestión del patrimonio, ha tenido como correlato, por un lado, la postergación de acciones imprescindibles para la conservación de muchos referentes edilicios del pasado con el consecuente deterioro por abandono de los mismos y por otro lado, la concreción de algunas intervenciones basadas en modelos técnicos y de gestión, más propias de obras nuevas, que ignoran particularidades esenciales del valor patrimonial y sus desafíos. A partir de una experiencia eficaz en la puesta en valor del Oratorio del Cementerio Municipal de Santa Fe (Argentina), este trabajo destaca algunos lineamientos de intervención innovadores, tanto en el campo de la gestión como de las acciones técnicas, a fin de dejar testimonio de las mismas y presentarse como variantes útiles a la disciplina.
Propósito. Se hace una aproximación teórico-argumentativa, sobre la importancia de anexar en los protocolos comunitarios bioculturales (PCB), la realización de innovación de negocios circulares e inclusivos (iNCI) en México.
Metodología. Se revisa literatura sobre los PCB, con métodos de evaluación de recursos biológicos o de conocimiento tradicional a proteger incluyendo métodos de evaluación de impacto social para diseñar e implementar la iNCI basados en emprendimientos de base tecnológica o startups de impacto social (SIS). La prospectiva estratégica es resaltada como generadora de escenarios de negocios para llevarlos a cabo.
Hallazgos. Propuesta de modelo conceptual funcional PCB-iNCI a través de una SIS.
Originalidad. La posibilidad tanto de atraer inversionistas a la comunidad y viceversa para logro de beneficios mutuos.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.