“…Some authors (De Miguel-Guzmán, 2006;Vega-De la Cruz, Lao-León, & Nieves-Julbe, 2017;Chiavenato, 2009) reflect the term as a Human Resource (HR), hyperbolizing it from the economic perspective and considering it as a means and not an end in itself; others (Goycher et al, 2018;Kaplan and Norton, 2004) refer to human talent (HT) observing the innate qualities in people and in other cases equating it to the referred RH; those who explain it as human capital (HC) stand out (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al, 2017), observing a traditional treatment to focus their management; others (Goycher et al, 2018;Martínez-Vivar et al, 2016;Niebel & Freivalds, 2009) involve the contemporary theories about intellectual capital (IC) without clear differentiation with respect to the HC; while, at the territorial level, they associate it with the term skilled workforce (SW) (García-Espalter & García-Espalter, 2009;Torres-Cala & García-Borrego, 2011) to highlight the specialized qualification levels for the performance of functions of the same character. This diversity in the treatment of the term does not contribute to maintaining a logical consequence to describe people as a holistic whole, an aspect that leads to the development of this research to assume the term human resource, understood by the people who work and for its adjustment to the territorial context, potentials to work that contribute to human capital and intellectual capital.…”