Abstract:Loss of proprioception following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been well documented. We evaluated proprioception in both the injured and the uninjured limb in 25 patients with ACL injury and in 25 healthy controls, as assessed by joint position sense (JPS), the threshold for the detection of passive movement (TDPM) and postural sway during single-limb stance on a force plate. There were significant proprioceptive deficits in both ACL-deficient and uninjured knees compared with control knees, a… Show more
“…However, comparing the PRE measured from our study with previously published studies of the knee proprioception test administered to normal subjects, which range from 2.43° to 5.90° [202122], we assume the SCI patients in our study have impairment of knee proprioception. To confirm our assumption, further studies are required, which compares both control group and SCI group head-on.…”
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of a knee proprioception evaluation using a dynamometer as a tool for evaluating proprioception of the lower extremities in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), and to explore its usefulness in predicting the ambulatory outcome.MethodsA total of 14 SCI patients (10 tetraplegic, 4 paraplegic; all AIS D) were included in this study. The passive repositioning error (PRE) and active repositioning error (ARE) were measured with a dynamometer, along with tibial somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and abductor hallucis motor-evoked potential (MEP). Ambulatory capacity was assessed with the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II), both at the time of the proprioception test (WISCI_i) and at least 6 months after the test (WISCI_6mo).ResultsThe PRE showed a negative correlation with WISCI_i (r=-0.440, p=0.034) and WISCI_6mo (r=-0.568, p=0.010). Linear multiple regression showed the type of injury, lower extremities motor score, MEP, and PRE accounted for 75.4% of the WISCI_6mo variance (p=0.080).ConclusionProprioception of the knee can be measured quantitatively with a dynamometer in patients with incomplete SCI, and PRE was related to the outcome of the ambulatory capacity. Along with the neurological and electrophysiological examinations, a proprioception test using a dynamometer may have supplementary value in predicting the ambulatory capacity in patients with incomplete SCI.
“…However, comparing the PRE measured from our study with previously published studies of the knee proprioception test administered to normal subjects, which range from 2.43° to 5.90° [202122], we assume the SCI patients in our study have impairment of knee proprioception. To confirm our assumption, further studies are required, which compares both control group and SCI group head-on.…”
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of a knee proprioception evaluation using a dynamometer as a tool for evaluating proprioception of the lower extremities in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), and to explore its usefulness in predicting the ambulatory outcome.MethodsA total of 14 SCI patients (10 tetraplegic, 4 paraplegic; all AIS D) were included in this study. The passive repositioning error (PRE) and active repositioning error (ARE) were measured with a dynamometer, along with tibial somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and abductor hallucis motor-evoked potential (MEP). Ambulatory capacity was assessed with the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II), both at the time of the proprioception test (WISCI_i) and at least 6 months after the test (WISCI_6mo).ResultsThe PRE showed a negative correlation with WISCI_i (r=-0.440, p=0.034) and WISCI_6mo (r=-0.568, p=0.010). Linear multiple regression showed the type of injury, lower extremities motor score, MEP, and PRE accounted for 75.4% of the WISCI_6mo variance (p=0.080).ConclusionProprioception of the knee can be measured quantitatively with a dynamometer in patients with incomplete SCI, and PRE was related to the outcome of the ambulatory capacity. Along with the neurological and electrophysiological examinations, a proprioception test using a dynamometer may have supplementary value in predicting the ambulatory capacity in patients with incomplete SCI.
“…For both the unpredictable and the predictable conditions, each subject was allowed a maximum of 5 practice trials for familiarization with the experimental procedures (Bennis et al 1996). Since 8 neuromuscular adaptations likely include central components, which are known to affect both limbs of patients with ACLR (Arockiaraj et al 2013), we compared their operated limb to the dominant limb of age-matched controls rather than to the contralateral limb.…”
“…However, we found a significant deficit in proprioceptive function in the ACL deficient limb compared with the contralateral limb, this was found to be in accordance with similar studies by Arockiaraj et al and Jerosch et al who assessed postural sway. 17,18 Similarly, studies by Barrett et al and Corrigan et al who evaluated proprioception using JPS and TDPM found a significantly lower proprioceptive activity in injured knees as compared to the uninjured knees. 6 Current research findings on the effects of ACL reconstruction on knee proprioceptive function gives no clear consensus.…”
OBJECTIVE:To quantify the deficit in proprioceptive function in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency and to quantify the improvement after Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction. Type of Study: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: The study included 73 patients (49 men, 24 women; mean age 26.8 years; range 21 to 40 years) who underwent Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction was performed using either a patellar tendon or a hamstring auto graft. All patients followed a standard rehabilitation program. Proprioceptive function in the form of (B. I) Balance Index Score was tested using Kinesthetic Ability Trainer (SPORT KAT 1750) preoperatively and at the end of third and sixth months after surgery. Their contralateral knees served as control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.