Proposisi dalam Rancag Si Pitung (Struktur, Makna Predikator, dan Peran Argumen)

Rosadi, Nicky

doi:10.30998/deiksis.v10i02.2343

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The role of the argument is determined by taking into account the roles that arise from the existing arguments based on their relationship to the predicator. In Indonesian, the roles of argument are divided into 19 roles (Rosadi, 2018), namely responder, actor, character, principal, characteristic, sufferer, target, outcome, gainer, measure, tool, place, place of origin, reach, method, participants, direction, time, and origin of the material.…”

Section: Define the Role Of The Argumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diathesis Deconstruction in Efforts to Differentiate Titles in Scientific Article Manuscripts

Rosadi

2021

Ltrts

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study attempts to describe the descriptive deconstruction of the title of a scientific article whose text is derived from the conversion of research reports. The method used in this study is a qualitative method using a propositional analysis model. Proposition analysis is an analytical model that seeks to dissect the structure of the language based on the structure outside the language. Therefore, this field of study is included in the field of psycholinguistic studies because it raises language problems based on human psychological elements. In this study, it is known that research reports and scientific articles have different reader objectives. Each has a different motive of interest. Research reports have expository motifs with specific audiences, such as leaders or related stakeholders. For this reason, the description and presentation are detailed and detailed. While scientific articles emphasize the informative side with the general target audience; academics, experts, and society in general. Because of this difference, the use of titles needs to be distinguished even though they have the same essence. This is because, by selecting the appropriate title, it is expected to increase the visitation and readability of the scientific article. One of the efforts that can be done is to diathesis deconstruct the research title. This diathesis deconstruction is based on a propositional analysis that looks at the structure of the proposition, the meaning of the predicator, and the role of the argument in the research title, which is then deconstructed by considering the construction of the previous diathesis.

show abstract

Section: Define the Role Of The Argumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diathesis Deconstruction in Efforts to Differentiate Titles in Scientific Article Manuscripts

Rosadi

2021

Ltrts

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kicauan Twitter yang merupakan konkretisasi pikiran dan perasaan remaja ini, akan dilihat sebagai kalimat/klausa bahasa. Setiap kalimat/klausa setidaknya memiliki unsur subjek dan predikat (Kridalaksana, 1985;Parera, 1991;Alwi, dkk., 2003;Rosadi, 2018). Keberadaan unsur ini bisa jadi tidak terlihat karena kicauan Twitter sejatinya pengejawantahan pikiran/perasaan secara langsung yang bisa saja terjadi proses penghilangan unsur untuk mencapai kepraktisan bahasa.…”

unclassified

“…Dalam hal ini, proposisi merupakan sebuah kajian psikolinguistik yang mencoba menguak struktur-dalam sebuah bahasa. Representasi struktur dalam otak penutur bahasa dapat terlihat dengan proposisi (Rosadi, 2018). Struktur proposisi berbeda dengan struktur fungsional bahasa (S, P, O, K).…”

unclassified

Proposisi dalam Kicauan Twitter Anak Usia Remaja

Rosadi

2021

Ltrts

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proposisi yang terdapat dalam kicauan Twitter anak usia remaja. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif kualitatif dengan analisis isi. Objek pada penelitian ini adalah teks kicauan dalam Twitter yang ditulis oleh anak usia remaja. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri yang dibantu dengan tabel analisis data dengan kriteria analisis melalui tiga pengamatan, yaitu struktur proposisi, relasi makna antara predikator dengan argumen, serta pembagian peran tiap-tiap argumen. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, ditemukan sebanyak 52,31% struktur proposisi P + N1, 50,77% predikator bermakna perbuatan, dan 25,86% argumen yang berperan sebagai pokok. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa struktur proposisi yang banyak digunakan dalam kicauan Twitter anak usia remaja adalah struktur predikasi inti, dengan predikator bermakna perbuatan, dan argumen yang berperan sebagai pokok.

show abstract

Proposisi dalam Rancag Si Pitung (Struktur, Makna Predikator, dan Peran Argumen)

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Diathesis Deconstruction in Efforts to Differentiate Titles in Scientific Article Manuscripts

Diathesis Deconstruction in Efforts to Differentiate Titles in Scientific Article Manuscripts

Proposisi dalam Kicauan Twitter Anak Usia Remaja

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About