Proposing leading indicators for blood sampling: application of a method based on the principles of resilient healthcare

Raben, Ditte Caroline; Bogh, Søren Bie; Viskum, B; Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby; Hollnagel, Erik

doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0437-z

Cited by 24 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The methods used to study RHC varied in the studies: fifteen were qualitative [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], and five used mixed methods [34][35][36][37]40]. The methods used in the studies published in books, however, were mainly qualitative [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] except two studies that used mixed methods [38,39].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies reported in peer-reviewed journals were mostly conducted in developed countries: the United Kingdom [36,41,43,45,47,54], the United States of America [34,44,52,53], Finland [46], Australia [40,49,51], Denmark [49][50][51]55], Norway [48] and Israel [37]. Two studies were conducted in developing countries: Brazil [42,52] and South Africa [35].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Resilience Markers Framework (RMF) was used to uncover resilience strategies used by anaesthetists, and to allow participants to reflect on their work demands and to contrast routine and non-routine aspects [61]. Different studies used the FRAM method to differentiate between WAI and WAD and to develop context-specific models in different clinical settings such as a preoperative anticoagulation management [51], blood sampling [50,54], clinical guidelines implementation [49] early detection of sepsis [55] and a Medical Department's daily variations and adjustments [64].…”

Section: Tools For Studying Rhcmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Raben DC, et al 2017 (Denmark) [50] …focuses on how healthcare systems succeed by rapidly responding and adapting performance in everyday work.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Resilient Health Care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience.

Iflaifel

Lim

Ryan

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Traditional approaches to safety management in health care have focused primarily on counting errors and understanding how things go wrong. Resilient Health Care (RHC) provides an alternative complementary perspective of learning from incidents and understanding how, most of the time, work is safe. The aim of this review was to identify how RHC is conceptualised, described and interpreted in the published literature, to describe the methods used to study RHC, and to identify factors that develop RHC.Methods Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases were performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies, and a hand search undertaken for studies published in books that explained how RHC as a concept has been interpreted, what methods have been used to study it, and what factors have been important to its development. Studies were evaluated independently by two researchers. Data was synthesised using a thematic approach.Results Thirty-six studies were included; they shared similar descriptions of RHC which was the ability to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following events and thereby sustain required operations under both expected and unexpected conditions. Qualitative methods were mainly used to study RHC. Two types of data sources have been used: direct (e.g. focus groups and surveys) and indirect (e.g. observations and simulations) data sources. Most of the tools for studying RHC were developed based on predefined resilient constructs and have been categorised into three categories: performance variability and Work As Done, cornerstone capabilities for resilience, and integration with other safety management paradigms. Tools for studying RHC currently exist but have yet to be fully implemented. Effective team relationships, trade-offs and health care ‘resilience’ training of health care professionals were factors used to develop RHC. Conclusions Although there was consistency in the conceptualisation of RHC, methods used to study and the factors used to develop it, several questions remain to be answered before a gold standard strategy for studying RHC can confidently be identified. These include operationalising RHC assessment methods in multi-level and diverse settings and developing, testing and evaluating interventions to address the wider safety implications of RHC amidst organisational and institutional change.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tools For Studying Rhcmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Raben DC, et al 2017 (Denmark) [50] …focuses on how healthcare systems succeed by rapidly responding and adapting performance in everyday work.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Resilient Health Care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience.

Iflaifel

Lim

Ryan

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands [12] 3.153 Multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands -capturing unexpected dependencies Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM [13] 3.153 Theoretical study; its applicability shown on a case of railway accident at Esher on 25 November 2005 Proposing leading indicators for blood sampling: application of a method based on the principles of resilient healthcare [14] 1.105 Theoretical study; its applicability shown on blood sampling Hazard/threat identification: Using functional resonance analysis method in conjunction with the Anticipatory Failure Determination method [15] 1.084 Theoretical study; its applicability shown on lifting operation Most of the papers address the problem that occurs in the last step of the FRAM, when the way of management of the performance variability is to be proposed. Anvarifar et al [12] notice that further work is required to test the applicability of the FRAM for detailed risk analysis in more complicated and data demanding case studies.…”

Section: Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applicability of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method in urban transport

Smoczyński

Gill

Kobaszyńska-Twardowska

et al. 2018

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Functional resonance is a novel approach of explaining how adverse events happen in complex socio-technical systems. It stresses the fact that such systems in most of the cases function without any negative consequences due to their internal adaptiveness, called resilience. Therefore, this approach is particularly suitable to domains with relatively high level of safety, where there is not much data on incidents and accidents form the past. It can also be used for describing other analyses domains in order to better understand their resilience mechanisms. The literature review performed with help of Scopus database shows clearly that the topic of functional resonance is getting more and more attention in the scientific world. The research aiming to develop the FRAM or using it as a tool for various kinds of safety analyses is being published in the best journals from a variety of disciplines, especially the Engineering. Transportation system was the domain of the research in four investigated papers; three times the aviation transport and once – maritime transport. There was no publication in the urban transportation, although the FRAM is applicable also in this domain.

show abstract