2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21843-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposing an ISO/IEC 15504-2 Compliant Method for Process Capability/Maturity Models Customization

Abstract: Abstract. The customization of software process capability/maturity models (SPCMMs) to specific domains/sectors or development methodologies represents one of the most discussed and applied trends in ICT organizations. Nonetheless, little research appears to have been performed on how theoretically sound and widely accepted SPCMMs should be developed to high quality. The aim of this paper is therefore to elicit the state-of-the-art regarding the processes adopted to develop such models and to propose a systema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The step of improving is derived from maturity model from process lifecycle standard. Like COBIT 5, the former COBIT made by ISACA, ISO/IEC 15504 proposes a concept of deliverables which is also as evidence of maturity level [14]. In COBIT 5, we know as Process Assessment Model (PAM), the model of evident of every process stage which be used in assessment maturity level process [15].…”
Section: Iso/iec 15504mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step of improving is derived from maturity model from process lifecycle standard. Like COBIT 5, the former COBIT made by ISACA, ISO/IEC 15504 proposes a concept of deliverables which is also as evidence of maturity level [14]. In COBIT 5, we know as Process Assessment Model (PAM), the model of evident of every process stage which be used in assessment maturity level process [15].…”
Section: Iso/iec 15504mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maturity assessments have been criticised for a lack of rigour during their design. There have been some efforts in proposing maturity assessments design methodologies [19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Although with individual nuances, studies by Metler (2011) and García-Mireles, Moraga [29] have found the different methodologies contain common steps.…”
Section: Design Elements Of a Maturity Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Tabela 1 apresenta os artigos selecionados. -HAUCK et al (2011) propõem um framework para customização de modelos de maturidade/capacidade de processos de software para um setor específico, tendo como base o padrão ISO/IEEE. O modelo proposto por Hauck, SPCMMs (Software Process Capability/Maturity Models), possui duas dimensões: do processo e da capacidade/maturidade.…”
Section: Mapeamento Sistemático Da Literaturaunclassified