2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01963-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposing an ensemble learning model based on neural network and fuzzy system for keratoconus diagnosis based on Pentacam measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, modern topographers, by adding high-resolution AS-OCT to their technology, are able to provide repeatable and reliable corneal, epithelial, and stromal maps, and the variables extracted from them have proven good diagnostic value in the detection of keratoconus 10 and in forme fruste and subclinical keratoconus forms. 7 Thus, considering that previously reported neural networks 3 , 5 , 6 used predominately keratometric and tomographic data, the addition of these new reliable data from combined Placido disc and high-resolution AS-OCT topographers could improve the detection capacity of these classification systems, as we did in the current study. All indexes used to train our ANN ( Table 1 ) showed “excellent” or “outstanding” keratoconus discrimination capacity according to their area under the ROC ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this context, modern topographers, by adding high-resolution AS-OCT to their technology, are able to provide repeatable and reliable corneal, epithelial, and stromal maps, and the variables extracted from them have proven good diagnostic value in the detection of keratoconus 10 and in forme fruste and subclinical keratoconus forms. 7 Thus, considering that previously reported neural networks 3 , 5 , 6 used predominately keratometric and tomographic data, the addition of these new reliable data from combined Placido disc and high-resolution AS-OCT topographers could improve the detection capacity of these classification systems, as we did in the current study. All indexes used to train our ANN ( Table 1 ) showed “excellent” or “outstanding” keratoconus discrimination capacity according to their area under the ROC ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The model's overall classification accuracy was 97%, highest for stage 4 KCN and lowest for ffKCN. Another study trained an ensemble CNN on tomography measurements to differentiate between normal eyes and early, moderate, and advanced KCN with a staging accuracy of 98% [42]. Two studies used only topography images to detect and stage KCN [43 ▪ ,44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model's overall classification accuracy was 97%, highest for stage 4 KC and lowest for FFKC. Another study trained an ensemble CNN on Pentacam measurements to differentiate between normal eyes and early, moderate, and advanced KC with a staging accuracy of 98.2% (Ghaderi et al, 2021). Other studies have focused on detecting KC progression, though each study had varying definitions of disease progression.…”
Section: Ai Application In Kcmentioning
confidence: 99%