2015
DOI: 10.3233/ifs-141312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposing a novel approach for classification and sequencing of Learning Objects in E-learning systems based on learning style

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the FSLSM is recognized as the most commonly used model for measuring individual learning styles on a general scale [73] in higher education [74] and has remained popular for many years across different disciplines in university settings and beyond. In the age of personalized instruction, this model has breathed new life into areas such as blended learning [75], online distance learning [76], courseware design [56], and intelligent tutoring systems [77,78]. Second, the FSLSM is based on previous learning style models; the FSLSM integrates all their advantages and is, thus, more comprehensive in delineating students' learning styles [79,80].…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the FSLSM is recognized as the most commonly used model for measuring individual learning styles on a general scale [73] in higher education [74] and has remained popular for many years across different disciplines in university settings and beyond. In the age of personalized instruction, this model has breathed new life into areas such as blended learning [75], online distance learning [76], courseware design [56], and intelligent tutoring systems [77,78]. Second, the FSLSM is based on previous learning style models; the FSLSM integrates all their advantages and is, thus, more comprehensive in delineating students' learning styles [79,80].…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active students do not learn much in situations that require their passivity; rather, they work well in groups, tend to communicate with others, and enjoy operating [31–33]. Reflective students prefer to think about materials independently and progress by drawing on the experience of others [34,35].…”
Section: Learning Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the 102, 74 attempted to propose different methods of LO/LS suitability classification and recommendation through many different approaches, such as dynamic programming [Muhammad 2015], fuzzy logic classification [Anitha and Deisy 2015], data mining [Shuib et al 2014], the ones cited on the second paragraph of the section 4.2 among others. As expected the list is much bigger than the examples mentioned.…”
Section: Tab 4 Lms Usage Amountsmentioning
confidence: 99%