2001
DOI: 10.1080/09500340121035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed performance measures for imaging systems with discrete detector arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these measures assume a linear system and are measured with respect to the spatial frequencies in the scene. If the scene is represented as an array of intensities f m, then an image of this scene gi produced by an imaging system is given by [2][3][4] gi X m f mhi − m;…”
Section: Modulation Transfer Function For An Optical System With a DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these measures assume a linear system and are measured with respect to the spatial frequencies in the scene. If the scene is represented as an array of intensities f m, then an image of this scene gi produced by an imaging system is given by [2][3][4] gi X m f mhi − m;…”
Section: Modulation Transfer Function For An Optical System With a DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement assume a linear system and is measured with respect to spatial frequencies in the scene [2]. However, digitalized image systems commonly seen on the market, such as CCD and complementary metaloxide semiconductor cameras, reflected a lack of anisoplanatism observed with the detector arrays when measured using the more usual definition of the modulation transfer function (MTF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%