2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed diagnostic criteria and the screening and diagnosing tool of Internet addiction in college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
149
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
149
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of scales were developed and used for internet addiction in studies. Examples of such scales include Young's 'Internet Addiction Test -IAT' (Young 1998b), 'Diagnostic Questionnaire for Internet Addiction -YDQ' (Petersen et al 2009), 'Pathological Internet Use Scale -PIUS' (Johansson and Götestam 2004), 'Chinese Internet Addiction Scale-Revision -CIAS-R' (Tsai et al 2009) and 'Distinguishing Characteristics of Internet Addiction -DC-IA-C' (Ko et al 2009). In a trial systematically investigating the psychometric aspects of the Internet Addiction Test -IAT, 6 factors came to the fore, which are salience, excessive use, neglecting work, anticipation, lack of control and neglecting social life.…”
Section: Materials Used In Diagnoses and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of scales were developed and used for internet addiction in studies. Examples of such scales include Young's 'Internet Addiction Test -IAT' (Young 1998b), 'Diagnostic Questionnaire for Internet Addiction -YDQ' (Petersen et al 2009), 'Pathological Internet Use Scale -PIUS' (Johansson and Götestam 2004), 'Chinese Internet Addiction Scale-Revision -CIAS-R' (Tsai et al 2009) and 'Distinguishing Characteristics of Internet Addiction -DC-IA-C' (Ko et al 2009). In a trial systematically investigating the psychometric aspects of the Internet Addiction Test -IAT, 6 factors came to the fore, which are salience, excessive use, neglecting work, anticipation, lack of control and neglecting social life.…”
Section: Materials Used In Diagnoses and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal reliability of the scale and subscales in the original study ranged from 0.79 to 0.93. 28,29 BIS/BAS scales. The BIS/BAS scales assess individual differences in the sensitivity of the two motivational systems proposed by Gray.…”
Section: Center For Epidemiological Studies Depression Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, los valores obtenidos difieren de los estudios de otros autores (Ko et al, 2009;Hardie & Tee, 2007;Man Sally, 2006).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified