1975
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-25-3-252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposals for a Reappraisal of the Status of the Names of Plant-Pathogenic Pseudomonas Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a recommendation has been made for the rejection of the epithet panici, which was not meant to be applied to fluorescent organisms (11); however, the strain included in our studies, as well as in the studies of other workers (3,7,28,30), is definitely a pathovar of P. syringae, although its origin is unclear.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Recently, a recommendation has been made for the rejection of the epithet panici, which was not meant to be applied to fluorescent organisms (11); however, the strain included in our studies, as well as in the studies of other workers (3,7,28,30), is definitely a pathovar of P. syringae, although its origin is unclear.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Other species of Pseudomonas reported by Dye et al ( , 1975 are identical to established species, or have been placed inappropriately in the genus.…”
Section: Genus I Acetobactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many pathogens which are legitimate species were not examined. Dye et al ( , 1975 published a list of legitimate species for which cultures are available, all of which are assigned to species in Pseudomonas or other genera, in the treatment below.…”
Section: Genus I Acetobactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dye et al (13) suggested that all validly published names of plant pathogenic species of Pseudomonas for which there are isolates be retained until further studies have established their relationships accurately. This paper reports a taxonomic study of P. pomi and of strains identified as belonging to P. melophthora.…”
Section: Pseudomonas Melophthoramentioning
confidence: 99%