2011
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.023770-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal that Mycobacterium massiliense and Mycobacterium bolletii be united and reclassified as Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii comb. nov., designation of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus subsp. nov. and emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus

Abstract: The names ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus’ and ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense’, proposed by Leao et al. (2009, J Clin Microbiol 47, 2691–2698), cannot be validly published. The purpose of this report is to provide a description in accordance with the Rules of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Moreover, the proposal of the name ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense’ is contrary to Rule 38 and the correct name of this taxon, at the rank of subspecies, is My… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
121
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
121
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (17), although recent population and comparative genomic studies support the three previously recognized subspecies, i.e., M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (17), although recent population and comparative genomic studies support the three previously recognized subspecies, i.e., M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bolletii into a single subspecies called M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (Leao et al, 2011). However, wholegenome sequencing supported the separation as three subspecies (Bryant et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bolletii, and that a new subspecies, M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, should be designated (9). However, a recent whole-genome study strongly supported the hypothesis that the species can be divided into at least three subspecies: M. abscessus subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%