Proposal readability, audit firm size and engagement success

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the effects of firm size on audit proposal readability and audit proposal readability on auditor selection using readability metrics. Design/methodology/approach Adopting the Flesch reading ease readability formula, the authors analyze the readability of 370 hand-collected audit proposals submitted by audit firms for US state and local governments’ audit service contracts. Findings The authors find differences in readability across audit firm size, specifically the proposals written by smaller firms are more readable than those submitted by larger firms. The results further indicate that readability metrics correlate with auditor selection, i.e. an increase in audit proposal readability from the first to third quartile improves the likelihood of a firm winning the engagement by about 6 per cent, ceteris paribus. In addition, while audit fees and an existing auditor–client relationship are associated with engagement success, proxies for audit quality (i.e. audit firm size, audit experience of lead partner) are not. Research limitations/implications The Flesch reading ease measure is a simple linear combination of text attributes, which assumes that readability is a single, unidimensional construct. Simple readability metrics, such as the Flesch reading ease, may confound environmental complexity with readability. Practical implications Readability improves audit proposal success. Originality/value The results provide insight to accounting stakeholders regarding the potential influence of readability on audit firm selection. In short, readability matters.

The Role of Ownership in Increasing Firm Value of Manufacturing Industry in Indonesia

“…Therefore, investors will make investment decisions to the firm because the greater the total asset is, the more the firm will face the economic competition in the capital market. Krause & Tse, (2016); Bhat et al, (2018); Park et al, (2018); Noronha et al, (2018); Garner & Lacina, (2019); Nie et al, (2019); Chang & Stone, (2019) show that firm size has a positive influence on firm value.…”

Are female CFOs more ethical to the occurrences of financial reporting fraud? Theoretical and empirical evidence from cross-listed firms in the US

“…We include Firm size , which is the logarithm of a company's total assets because small firms are less prone to conduct fraud, while large firms are more likely to engage in serious deception of financial reporting to accomplish their financial goals (Chen et al , 2021; Chahine et al , 2021). We include Return on assets , which is measured as net income over total assets, to control for firm profitability and accounting performance (Amiram et al , 2020; Dimitras et al , 2015; Chang and Stone, 2019). Zalata et al (2022) and Lee et al (2006) argue rapid growth is significantly related to the perpetration of corporate fraud.…”

أثر التنوع الجنسي لأعضاء لجنة المراجعة على العلاقة بين نرجسية مراقب الحسابات وقابلية تقريره عن مراجعة القوائم المالية السنوية للقراءة: دليل من الشركات المقيدة بالبورصة المصرية (باللغة الانجليزية)

“…It is clear to researchers, from the analysis of previous studies (e.g., Velte, 2018a;Chang & Stone, 2019a, 2019bSalehi et al, 2020;Jayasree & Shette, 2021), that other analysis can be considered as one of the methodologies used to add more clarity and understanding to the relationships under study in basic analysis, and to address any defects in the basic research model, if any. This is achieved by relying on variables whose impact has not been previously verified or by changing the method of dealing with the impact of previously tested variables on the relationships under study.…”