2005
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.42.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of Direct Calculation of Kinetic Parameters .BETA.eff and .LAMBDA. Based on Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Method

Abstract: Direct calculation methods of kinetic parameters are proposed based on the continuous energy Monte Carlo method. In the proposed methods, the effective delayed neutron fraction eff and the neutron generation time à are estimated using eigenvalue calculations. The expected number of fission neutrons in the next generation is newly applied to the proposed methods instead of the adjoint flux that has been conventionally used. The algorithms to estimate the kinetic parameters are established and incorporated into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinetics parameters for the core loading with 32 elements are not reported in the original documents. We have nonetheless computed the adjoint-weighted kinetics parameters with T-4 R by resorting to the Iterated Fission Probability (IFP) method (Nauchi and Kameyama, 2010;Kiedrowski, 2011;Leppanen, 2014;Truchet et al, 2015), which yields β eff = 778 ± 4.6 pcm for the effective delayed neutron fraction and Λ eff = 22.2 ± 0.02 µs for the effective mean generation time. For comparison, the typical values for a commercial 1000 MW PWR at ∼ 3.25 % enrichment and moderator to non-moderator ratio equal to ∼ 2 are β eff 700 pcm and Λ eff 25 µs (Duderstadt and Hamilton, 1976).…”
Section: Operational Core Loading At 70 • Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kinetics parameters for the core loading with 32 elements are not reported in the original documents. We have nonetheless computed the adjoint-weighted kinetics parameters with T-4 R by resorting to the Iterated Fission Probability (IFP) method (Nauchi and Kameyama, 2010;Kiedrowski, 2011;Leppanen, 2014;Truchet et al, 2015), which yields β eff = 778 ± 4.6 pcm for the effective delayed neutron fraction and Λ eff = 22.2 ± 0.02 µs for the effective mean generation time. For comparison, the typical values for a commercial 1000 MW PWR at ∼ 3.25 % enrichment and moderator to non-moderator ratio equal to ∼ 2 are β eff 700 pcm and Λ eff 25 µs (Duderstadt and Hamilton, 1976).…”
Section: Operational Core Loading At 70 • Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the typical values for a commercial 1000 MW PWR at ∼ 3.25 % enrichment and moderator to non-moderator ratio equal to ∼ 2 are β eff 700 pcm and Λ eff 25 µs (Duderstadt and Hamilton, 1976). In order to evaluate the impact of the IFP method on the assessment of the kinetics parameters, we have also computed the adjointweighted kinetics parameters by resorting to the IFP 0 approximated method, based on the expected number of fission neutrons in the next generation (Nauchi and Kameyama, 2005), which yields β 0 eff = 768 ± 1.2 pcm for the effective delayed neutron fraction and Λ 0 eff = 25.8 ± 0.007 µs for the effective mean generation time. The computed (un-weighted) delayed neutron fraction reads β 0 = 724 ± 0.8 and the (un-weighted) mean generation time Λ 0 = 45.8 ± 0.02 µs.…”
Section: Operational Core Loading At 70 • Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) On the other hand, Meulekamp et al assume that eff is the ratio of the average number of fissions generated by delayed neutrons to the average number of fissions generated by all neutrons. 2) In these methods, the number of fission neutrons or the number of fissions are counted at each neutron generation in continuous-energy Monte Carlo calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%