2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a simple method to estimate neutrino oscillation probability and CP violation in matter

Abstract: We study neutrino oscillation within the framework of three generations in matter. We propose a simple method to approximate the coefficients A, B and C which do not depend on the CP phase δ in the oscillation probability P (νe → νµ) = A cos δ + B sin δ + C. An advantage of our method is that an approximate formula of the coefficients A, B and C in arbitrary matter without the usual first order perturbative calculations of the small parameter ∆m 2 21 /∆m 2 31 or sin θ13 can be derived. Furthermore we show that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the lower T2K energies, the ratio |A/∆m 2 | is a factor 3-4 smaller, and the baseline (x = 295 km) is also smaller, so that oscillations are almost vacuum-like. See also [129,130,131,132,133] for recent analytical studies of 3ν probabilities at accelerator baselines and energies. Note that the above form for P µe , despite being useful for later discussions, is not used in our analysis, which is based on full 3ν numerical probabilities in matter (for both appearance and disappearance channels) without any approximation.…”
Section: Long-baseline Accelerator Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the lower T2K energies, the ratio |A/∆m 2 | is a factor 3-4 smaller, and the baseline (x = 295 km) is also smaller, so that oscillations are almost vacuum-like. See also [129,130,131,132,133] for recent analytical studies of 3ν probabilities at accelerator baselines and energies. Note that the above form for P µe , despite being useful for later discussions, is not used in our analysis, which is based on full 3ν numerical probabilities in matter (for both appearance and disappearance channels) without any approximation.…”
Section: Long-baseline Accelerator Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eqs. (2.4) and (2.5) hold exactly in the case of θ 23 = 45 • [31], where the coefficients A µα , B µα and C µα (α = e, µ, τ ) are the quantities determined by the parameters except for δ. If we assume the unitarity in the framework of three generations, the sum of these probabilities has to be one for any value of δ.…”
Section: Region With Large Cp Dependencementioning
confidence: 89%
“…See ref. [31] for example. It should be noted that the magnitude of A µµ is as same as that of A µe and is not so small.…”
Section: Region With Large Cp Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important considering that simulation of LBL experiments and performing χ 2 -fits require a fast and simple method to compute a large number of oscillation probabilities. Therefore even though the numerical calculation is always viable, there are still many studies on analytic approximation formulae for neutrino oscillation in matter [13,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)090mentioning
confidence: 99%