2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11072889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a Probabilistic Model on Rotating Bending Fatigue Property of a Bearing Steel in a Very High Cycle Regime

Abstract: In S-N diagrams for high strength steels, the duplex S-N curves for surface-initiated failure and interior inclusion-initiated failure were usually confirmed in the very high cycle regime. This trend is more distinct in the loading type of rotating bending, due to the stress distribution across the section. In the case of interior failure mode, the fish-eye is usually observed on the fracture surface and an inclusion is also observed at the center of the fish-eye. In the present work, the authors attempted to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of rotating bending, the inclusion site is also important factor to determine the fatigue strength due to the stress distribution across the specimen section. In such a situation, when the fatigue strength is evaluated by nominal bending stress, the fatigue strength at N=109, σw9*, is given by the following 100 : σw9*goodbreak=19101.5ξρ1/6. If n inclusions are included in a specimen, the largest inclusion size ρn governs the fatigue strength. Based on this aspect, Sakai et al had derived the probability density function f()ρn as follows 100 : f()ρngoodbreak=nF0ρnn1abρnba1italicexp{}goodbreak−ρnba, a , b and c are Weibull parameters.…”
Section: Brief Review For Researches On Vhcfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of rotating bending, the inclusion site is also important factor to determine the fatigue strength due to the stress distribution across the specimen section. In such a situation, when the fatigue strength is evaluated by nominal bending stress, the fatigue strength at N=109, σw9*, is given by the following 100 : σw9*goodbreak=19101.5ξρ1/6. If n inclusions are included in a specimen, the largest inclusion size ρn governs the fatigue strength. Based on this aspect, Sakai et al had derived the probability density function f()ρn as follows 100 : f()ρngoodbreak=nF0ρnn1abρnba1italicexp{}goodbreak−ρnba, a , b and c are Weibull parameters.…”
Section: Brief Review For Researches On Vhcfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a situation, when the fatigue strength is evaluated by nominal bending stress, the fatigue strength at N=109, σw9*, is given by the following 100 : σw9*goodbreak=19101.5ξρ1/6. If n inclusions are included in a specimen, the largest inclusion size ρn governs the fatigue strength. Based on this aspect, Sakai et al had derived the probability density function f()ρn as follows 100 : f()ρngoodbreak=nF0ρnn1abρnba1italicexp{}goodbreak−ρnba, a , b and c are Weibull parameters. In addition, the probability density function of the inclusion depth ξ is derived as follows 100 : f0()ξgoodbreak=2rFc()1goodbreak−ξr,true[0<ξ<250μm In Equation (16), r means the radius of the specimen and Fc indicates the probability giving the condition of 0 < ξ < 250 μm.…”
Section: Brief Review For Researches On Vhcfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most known ways of degradation of a steel member are corrosion of steel and fatigue processes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Verifying structure in terms of fatigue is an inseparable part of the new structural design or part of verifying the existing bridge structures [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%