2014
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2014.905803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a plutonium burner system based on HTGR with high proliferation resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process converting the TRISO fuel particle to the IMF kernel will need complex mechanical and combustion processes because the IMF kernel is protected by chemically inert and robust ceramics layers (Takei et al, 2003). And the plutonium extraction process from IMF kernel needs dissolution in nitric acid solution as well as irradiate fuels and will be difficult in the conventional PUREX process as the dissolution experiment of the IMF shows zirconium which is a host phase of plutonium dissolved only 2% even in concentrated nitric acid solution in 3 days (Fukaya et al, 2014). Then IMF will be quite difficult to extract plutonium completely even in several months and its conversion time should be greater than 3 months which is the conversion time estimated for the irradiated fuel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process converting the TRISO fuel particle to the IMF kernel will need complex mechanical and combustion processes because the IMF kernel is protected by chemically inert and robust ceramics layers (Takei et al, 2003). And the plutonium extraction process from IMF kernel needs dissolution in nitric acid solution as well as irradiate fuels and will be difficult in the conventional PUREX process as the dissolution experiment of the IMF shows zirconium which is a host phase of plutonium dissolved only 2% even in concentrated nitric acid solution in 3 days (Fukaya et al, 2014). Then IMF will be quite difficult to extract plutonium completely even in several months and its conversion time should be greater than 3 months which is the conversion time estimated for the irradiated fuel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMF composed of a stable solid solution of TRU oxide and yttria stabilized zirconia in fluorite-type crystal structure is difficult to extract plutonium from that because of its specific crystal structure (Fukaya et al, 2014). Theft and diversion of nuclear material to produce the nuclear explosive device (NED) is one of the most significant threats in nuclear security and non-proliferation, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRU elimination was also analysed in Generation IV reactors, such as lead-cooled fast reactor [5], sodium-cooled fast reactor [24], high temperature gas-cooled reactor [25], and molten salt reactor [26,27]. Fast-spectrum reactors possess an advantage in term of high neutron energy which allows the fission of various TRU elements.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, plutonium (Pu)-burner HTGR is proposed to reduce Pu inventory by combustion using the inherently safe HTGR as focused on a super-safe nuclear system after the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident . In order to burn plutonium efficiently and in large quantities, Pu-burner HTGR targets a burnup of 10 times or more than that of ordinary uranium fuel of 500 GWd/thm (Fukaya, 2014). In addition, TRISO-CFP fabrication also had been confirmed to be high-reliability, i.e., 1/100 times smaller damage ratio over the conventional TRISO-CFP fabrication, through HTTR operation (Ueta, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%