2017
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines6010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a Novel Natural Biomaterial, the Scleral Ossicle, for the Development of Vascularized Bone Tissue In Vitro

Abstract: Recovering of significant skeletal defects could be partially abortive due to the perturbations that affect the regenerative process when defects reach a critical size, thus resulting in a non-healed bone. The current standard treatments include allografting, autografting, and other bone implant techniques. However, although they are commonly used in orthopedic surgery, these treatments have some limitations concerning their costs and their side effects such as potential infections or malunions. On this accoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to introduce respective treatments, tissue is transplanted within the patient from one site to another or between two different patients. Both approaches have their drawbacks; i.e., anatomical restrictions, the risk of transferring diseases between the patients, and a possible rejection response from the patient’s immune system [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to introduce respective treatments, tissue is transplanted within the patient from one site to another or between two different patients. Both approaches have their drawbacks; i.e., anatomical restrictions, the risk of transferring diseases between the patients, and a possible rejection response from the patient’s immune system [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although autologous bone transplantation has obvious advantages, such as immunocompatibility, excellent bone conduction, osteoinduction and osteogenic properties, its applications are limited due to the insufficient supply of donor tissue and the risk of complications at the donor site. Similarly, the use of allografts and xenografts is limited by the immune response or infection [ 17 19 ]. The autologous bone grafts, allografts and xenografts in the above methods can significantly promote bone regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the obvious advantages of immune compatibility and excellent osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties, the application of bone autografting is limited by the dearth of donor tissue supply and risk of donor site complications. Similarly, the use of allografts and xenografts has been constrained by more serious problems such as immune responses or infections 10,11 . Although these treatments have significantly contributed to bone regeneration, they require complicated, appropriate, and reliable manipulations for successful bone regeneration 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%