2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2018.5269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a new virtual evaluation approach of preventive safety applications and advanced driver assistance functions – application: AEB system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current learning-based algorithms rely heavily on the integrity of the training set and can perform well in a given scene, but it is difficult to adapt to the collaborative decision-making of multi-scene and multi-task. NVIDIA trained the decision system by CNN and obtained real-time response to small change of environment [22] . In terms of the correctness of decision results, both rule-based algorithm and learning-based algorithm can complete accurate driving tasks in appropriate scenarios and give correct decision results.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Above Mentioned Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current learning-based algorithms rely heavily on the integrity of the training set and can perform well in a given scene, but it is difficult to adapt to the collaborative decision-making of multi-scene and multi-task. NVIDIA trained the decision system by CNN and obtained real-time response to small change of environment [22] . In terms of the correctness of decision results, both rule-based algorithm and learning-based algorithm can complete accurate driving tasks in appropriate scenarios and give correct decision results.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Above Mentioned Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five parameters considered in the multi-objective search were identified through discussions with the domain expert, namely, the speed of the vehicle and the pedestrian, and the position and orientation of the pedestrian. In a research study by Chelbi et al (2018), six influence parameters, namely, the relative distance, relative speed, temperature, humidity, weather event, and visibility, were included in the generation model of test scenarios for an autonomous emergency braking system. Similarly, values of eight demonstrative influence parameters, which are related to the kinematic status of eGO and target vehicles, were varied by Kluck et al (2019) to create test scenarios for virtual ADAS verification and validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park used vehicle dynamics and sensor fusion information to calculate the warning distance, and predicted the vehicle speed before the accident happens to determine the precise warning and braking time [10]. Chelbi pointed out that when the AEB braking is an emergency to prevent a collision, the yaw moment generated by the asymmetric braking force will result in losing control of the vehicle [11], and Xue found that the coordinated control of steer‐by‐wire (SBW) can solve the problem of vehicle loss of control caused by asymmetric yaw moment when AEB starts on mu‐split road conditions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%