2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41048-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal for a Motional-State Bell Inequality Test with Ultracold Atoms

Abstract: We propose and theoretically simulate an experiment for demonstrating a motional-state Bell inequality violation for pairs of momentum-entangled atoms produced in Bose-Einstein condensate collisions. The proposal is based on realizing an atom-optics analog of the Rarity-Tapster optical scheme: it uses laser-induced Bragg pulses to implement two-particle interferometry on the underlying Bell state for two pairs of atomic scattering modes with equal but opposite momenta. The collision dynamics and the sequence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Ref. [11], our proposal here to use the partial coincidence p soc (k 1 , k 2 ) instead of the total G(k 1 , k 2 ) is particularly advantageous, because the maximum quantal value of S = 2 √ 2 decreases rapidly when higheroccupancy components are considered in the two-particle wave function, and can even become smaller than the classical value of 2 [91].…”
Section: Demonstrating the Violation Of Bell Inequalities With Tramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike Ref. [11], our proposal here to use the partial coincidence p soc (k 1 , k 2 ) instead of the total G(k 1 , k 2 ) is particularly advantageous, because the maximum quantal value of S = 2 √ 2 decreases rapidly when higheroccupancy components are considered in the two-particle wave function, and can even become smaller than the classical value of 2 [91].…”
Section: Demonstrating the Violation Of Bell Inequalities With Tramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a larger-sized example, consider the same Hamiltonian and master equation as (95) and (96) (take N = 0), but with a longer chain of 32 sites, which is already beyond or at the limit of the capabilities of alternative methods such as brute force or corner space renormalisation [24,59]. The tunnelling term in (95) now becomes −J 31 j=1 a † j a j+1 + a † j+1 a j , and a driving of F = 3 remains only at the j = 1 site. While the stationary state does not show any time-dependent change in expectation values, we should expect to still see signatures of transport in its multi-time correlations as a function of distance and delay time if the method is good.…”
Section: Correlation Dynamics In the Stationary Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used for solving and simulating a multitude of problems in various physical fields: e.g. quantum optics [21,28,30,32,52,54,84,91,110], ultracold atoms [22,39,40,49,74,82,94,95,101,102,108,125,131,134,144], fermionic systems [6,7,27,29], spin systems [11,106,107], nuclear physics [137], dissipative systems in condensed matter [26,45,143], or cosmology [111]. The vast majority of such calculations so far have considered only equal time correlations and observables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is readily adapted to cases where several complex-valued fields are present. One such case that may be aided with the algorithm presented here are positive-P simulations of supersonic BEC collisions [6,[34][35][36]. Here, two independent complex-valued fields ψ(x) and ψ + (x) that correspond to the Ψ(x) and Ψ † (x) Bose fields are used, and allow for the exact treatment of quantum fluctuations.…”
Section: Generalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%