Proposal and Evaluation of Policy Description for Information Lifecycle Management

Tanaka, Tetsuo; Ueda, Ryoichi; Aizono, Toshiko; Ushijima, Kazutomo; Naitoh, Ichiro; Komoda, Norihisa

doi:10.1109/cimca.2005.1631276

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ILM refers to strategies for administering storage systems on computing devices [36]. Furthermore, ILM is for applying obvious and comprehensive policies to ensure correct information management.…”

Section: Information Lifecycle Management (Ilm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A New Concept Based on Process Engineering Methodologies

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to tackle interoperability issues of large-scale automation systems, SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture) principles, where information exchange is manifested by systems providing and consuming services, have already been introduced. However, the deployment, operation, and maintenance of an extensive SoS (System of Systems) mean enormous challenges for system integrators as well as network and service operators. The existing lifecycle management approaches do not cover all aspects of SoS management; therefore, an integrated solution is required. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new lifecycle approach, namely the SoSLM (System of Systems Lifecycle Management). This paper first provides an in-depth description and comparison of the most relevant process engineering methodologies and ITSM (Information Technology Service Management) frameworks, and how they affect various lifecycle management strategies. The paper’s novelty strives to introduce an Industry 4.0-compatible PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) model and to extend it to cover SoS management-related issues on well-known process engineering methodologies. The presented methodologies are adapted to the PLM model, thus creating the recommended SoSLM model. This is supported by demonstrations of how the IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things) applications and services can be developed and handled. Accordingly, complete implementation and integration are presented based on the proposed SoSLM model, using the Arrowhead framework that is available for IIoT SoS.

show abstract

Section: Information Lifecycle Management (Ilm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A New Concept Based on Process Engineering Methodologies

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An information user is typically a business person, who often has difficulties with understanding metadata attributes. This makes it difficult for a business person to specify policies [Tanaka et al 2005]. The second problem is that developing file retention policies is a time-consuming task and realizing a complete set of policies that cover all files is too labor intensive [Turczyk et al 2007].…”

Section: Research Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the determination of retention policies by using this framework is problematic. The first problem is that policies should be specified by information users, not by system administrators [Tanaka et al 2005]. An information user is typically a business person, who often has difficulties with understanding metadata attributes.…”

Section: Research Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value-Based File Retention

Wijnhoven

Amrit

Dietz

2014

J. Data and Information Quality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several file retention policy methods propose that a file retention policy should be based on file value. Though such a retention policy might increase the value of accessible files, the method to arrive at such a policy is underresearched. This article discusses how one can arrive at a method for developing file retention policies based on the use values of files. The method's applicability is initially assessed through a case study at Capgemini, Netherlands. In the case study, we hypothesize that one can develop a file retention policy by testing causal relations between file attributes (as used by file retention methods) and the use value of files. Unfortunately, most file attributes used by file retention methods have a weak correlation with file value, resulting in the conclusion that these methods do not well select out high-and low-value files. This would imply the ineffectiveness of the used attributes in our study or errors in our conceptualization of file value. We continue with the last possibility and develop indicators for file utility (with low utility being waste). With this approach we were able to detect waste files, in a sample of files, with an accuracy of 80%. We therefore not only suggest further research in information waste detection as part of a file retention policy, but also to further explore other file attributes that could better predict file value and file utility. ACM Reference Format:Wijnhoven, F., Amrit, C., and Dietz, P. 2014. Value-based file retention: File attributes as file value and information waste indicators.

show abstract

Efficient Operational Management of Enterprise File Server with User-Intended File Access Time

Matsumoto

Onoyama

2015

Transactions on Engineering Technologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proposal and Evaluation of Policy Description for Information Lifecycle Management

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A New Concept Based on Process Engineering Methodologies

System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A New Concept Based on Process Engineering Methodologies

Value-Based File Retention

Efficient Operational Management of Enterprise File Server with User-Intended File Access Time

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About