2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.06398
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProportionNet: Balancing Fairness and Revenue for Auction Design with Deep Learning

Kevin Kuo,
Anthony Ostuni,
Elizabeth Horishny
et al.

Abstract: The design of revenue-maximizing auctions with strong incentive guarantees is a core concern of economic theory. Computational auctions enable online advertising, sourcing, spectrum allocation, and myriad financial markets. Analytic progress in this space is notoriously difficult; since Myerson's 1981 work characterizing single-item "optimal" auctions, there has been limited progress outside of restricted settings. A recent paper by Dütting et al. circumvents analytic difficulties by applying deep learning tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, multiple extensions of RegretNet have been proposed, including the extensions to the optimal auction design with budget constraints [14], fairness constraints [31], and human preferences over desirable allocations [48], as well as the problem of faculty allocation [15] and the matching problem [51]. Shen et al [54] and Dütting et al [12] propose revenue-maximizing alternatives to RegretNet that are exactly DSIC but that are only applicable to the auctions with one bidder.…”
Section: Other Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, multiple extensions of RegretNet have been proposed, including the extensions to the optimal auction design with budget constraints [14], fairness constraints [31], and human preferences over desirable allocations [48], as well as the problem of faculty allocation [15] and the matching problem [51]. Shen et al [54] and Dütting et al [12] propose revenue-maximizing alternatives to RegretNet that are exactly DSIC but that are only applicable to the auctions with one bidder.…”
Section: Other Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work has built directly on both RochetNet and RegretNet [30,10,43,44]. Others have taken a similar approach but applied to different mechanism design problems, including finding welfare-maximizing auctions [49] and facility location [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This learning approach to auction design can replicate some known-optimal auctions, and can learn good auctions in settings where the optimal auction is not known. It has been extended in a variety of ways [10,49,21,30,18,43,44,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41] shares significant, but limited results which solve the case in which items may have at most 2 values. Due to the apparent difficulty of analytically designing strategyproof, revenue maximizing auctions, recent methods instead approximate optimal auctions using machine learning approaches [13,10,19,25,15,32,33]. [37] proposes an method which guarantees exact strategyproofness in the single-agent setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, such as auctions involving job or credit advertisements, it might be necessary to additionally constrain the auction mechanism to ensure fairness with respect to protected characteristics [23,6]. Recent work has considered the problem of determining revenue-maximizing, strategyproof, fair auctions, either from a specific class [5] or with a general neural network approach [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%