2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional sampling strategy often captures more genetic diversity when population sizes vary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be attributed to the varying amounts of weedy rice in each region. The results demonstrate that the selection of a high number of samples from diverse populations throughout a particular area provides an accurate estimate of genetic diversity within the weedy rice population (Hobas et al 2013; Nazareno et al 2017; Rosenberger et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be attributed to the varying amounts of weedy rice in each region. The results demonstrate that the selection of a high number of samples from diverse populations throughout a particular area provides an accurate estimate of genetic diversity within the weedy rice population (Hobas et al 2013; Nazareno et al 2017; Rosenberger et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Nonetheless, the limited geographic coverage in previous studies makes comparison of population structures difficult, as sample sizes per se are critical in evolutionary studies (Hobas et al 2013; Nazareno et al 2017). The high number of samples and diverse populations selected in certain areas represent accurate estimates of genetic diversity within weedy rice populations (Rosenberger et al 2021). The aim of this study, therefore, is to determine the genetic diversity and population structure of weedy rice throughout northeast Thailand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, a population genetic study on the eastern North American A. ludovicana , recovered higher genetic variation ( H O = 0.36–0.54) and similar inbreeding coefficients ( F IS = 0.01–0.13) (Figure 2 , Table 1 , Smallwood et al., 2018 ). The differences in genetic diversity could be explained by data collection method (ddRADseq vs. microsatellites) (Hodel et al., 2017 ; Sunde et al., 2020 ), sampling collection bias (Hale et al., 2012 ; Rosenberger et al., 2021 ), population sizes, or a result of being more distantly related to the western Amsonia species. By contrast, the inbreeding coefficients across populations of all four taxa ( A. ludovicana and A. tharpii , A. fugatei , and A. longiflora ) were low and consistent with a self‐incompatible breeding system, which is known in the Apocynaceae (Gibbs, 2014 ; Lipow & Wyatt, 1999 ; Shuttleworth & Johnson, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When collecting, producing, and using seeds or plugs for restoration, care must be taken to capture the genetic diversity present at a source site while avoiding steps that may narrow diversity reintroduced (Basey et al, 2015). Large populations, especially where plants are distributed over a wide range of microhabitats, should harbor higher genetic diversity, while small populations (especially those that are fragmented) are more likely to have lower diversity as well as greater risk of being inbred (McGlaughlin et al, 2002;Rosenberger et al, 2021; question G1, Table 1). For longer-term persistence, genetic diversity helps populations survive local disturbances and adapt to future climate changes (Lau et al, 2019).…”
Section: Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%