2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6858826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional integral distributed optimization for dynamic network topologies

Abstract: This paper investigates proportional-integral distributed optimization when the underlying information exchange network is dynamic. Proportional-integral distributed optimization is a technique which combines consensus-based methods and dual-decomposition methods to form a method which has the convergence guarantees of dual-decomposition and the damped response of the consensus methods. This paper extends PI distributed optimization to allow for dynamic communication networks, permitting agents to change who t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cloud computer is taken to be capable of large batch computations and receives periodic transmissions from each agent containing each agent's own state. The cloud computer uses the agents' states to compute the next value of µ using Equation (6) and then transmits the states it received and the newly computed µ vector to each agent. Each agent then uses the information from the cloud to update its own state in the vein of (7).…”
Section: A Architecture Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cloud computer is taken to be capable of large batch computations and receives periodic transmissions from each agent containing each agent's own state. The cloud computer uses the agents' states to compute the next value of µ using Equation (6) and then transmits the states it received and the newly computed µ vector to each agent. Each agent then uses the information from the cloud to update its own state in the vein of (7).…”
Section: A Architecture Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At timestep 0, each agent takes one gradient step to update its own state according to Equation (7). Simultaneously, and also at timestep 0, the cloud takes one gradient step to update the KT multipliers in the cloud according to Equation (6). Then at timestep 1, agent i sends its state, x i i (1), to the cloud.…”
Section: B Formal Architecture Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the above papers address so-called resource allocation problems [17] or its variations. In this paper, we deal with another type of distributed optimization studied in [18]- [27]. Nedić and Ozdaglar [18] present a distributed algorithm which combines consensus algorithms and subgradient methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fair comparison with these articles is difficult due to considerably different problem settings, but in general they do not prove exact convergence to the optimal solution whereas we do. The secondary contribution is to reveal that the problem in [18]- [27] can be treated within the passivity paradigm. Thirdly, we handle general convex inequality constraints in this paper, while the other passivity-based approaches [10]- [16] take only linear and/or scalar constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%