2020 13th International UNIMAS Engineering Conference (EnCon) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/encon51501.2020.9299339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional-Integral Ammonium-based Aeration Control for Activated Sludge Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using the PI controller, a compromise must always be made between aeration energy and effluent quality. If the aim is rather to improve the quality of the wastewater, the cost of aeration energy is high [8]- [11]. Moreover, a typical PI controller is not able to cope with the problems of nonlinearity, fluctuation of influent and severe disturbance in the treatment plant [12]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When using the PI controller, a compromise must always be made between aeration energy and effluent quality. If the aim is rather to improve the quality of the wastewater, the cost of aeration energy is high [8]- [11]. Moreover, a typical PI controller is not able to cope with the problems of nonlinearity, fluctuation of influent and severe disturbance in the treatment plant [12]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the efficiency of the proposed controller, its performance is evaluated with two other control configurations, namely the standard benchmark simulation model no. 1 (BSM1) PI [31] and the feedback controller PI ABAC [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ammonium-based feedback control approach detects the concentration of ammonium in the aerobic zone and controls the airflow via a VFD [27], or when used in cascade control provides feedback to the DO setpoint, which then controls the airflow. The feed-forward volume control approach is more effective in dealing with the NH 4 -N peak inflow than feedback control, which may be slower to respond in such a situation [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%