2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3309::aid-sim825>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional hazards model with random effects

Abstract: We propose a general proportional hazards model with random effects for handling clustered survival data. This generalizes the usual frailty model by allowing a multivariate random effect with arbitrary design matrix in the log relative risk, in a way similar to the modelling of random effects in linear, generalized linear and non‐linear mixed models. The distribution of the random effects is generally assumed to be multivariate normal, but other (preferably symmetrical) distributions are also possible. Maximu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
262
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(50 reference statements)
5
262
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kooperberg and Clarkson (1997), Betensky et al (1999), and Goetghebeur and Ryan (2000) consider independent interval-censored data. Vaida and Xu (2000) offer an approach based on the proportional hazards linear mixed model with right-censored data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kooperberg and Clarkson (1997), Betensky et al (1999), and Goetghebeur and Ryan (2000) consider independent interval-censored data. Vaida and Xu (2000) offer an approach based on the proportional hazards linear mixed model with right-censored data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the variance estimate of frailty isσ 2 = 0.478 (with SE = 0.313). Note that although we report the SE of σ 2 , one should not use it for testing the absence of frailty σ 2 = 0 (Vaida and Xu, 2000). Such a null hypothesis is on the boundary of the parameter space, and hence, the critical value of an asymptotic (χ 2 0 + χ 2 1 )/2 distribution is χ 2 1,0.10 = 2.71 at the 5% level (Ha et al, , 2012b.…”
Section: Shared Frailty Model: Kidney Infection Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to investigate the potential heterogeneity in event times among clusters (e.g. centers, patients) in order to understand and interpret the variability in the data (Vaida and Xu, 2000). For example, despite the use of standardized protocols in multicenter randomized clinical trials, outcome may vary between centers (Rondeau et al, 2008;Ha et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trial has been analysed earlier using a Cox model [43][44][45][46]. Since the proportional hazards assumption is questionable for the different treatment groups, we re-analysed the data set using the CTM approach and allowed for non-proportional effects of the patient characteristics over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%