2009
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2009.2016449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional Fair Multiuser Scheduling in LTE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 plots the empirical CDF of EESM and the CDF from the proposed lognormal model. Correlation between the th and th PRBs is modeled using the following geometrically decaying correlation model [12]:…”
Section: B Empirical Verification Of Lognormal Model For Eesmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 plots the empirical CDF of EESM and the CDF from the proposed lognormal model. Correlation between the th and th PRBs is modeled using the following geometrically decaying correlation model [12]:…”
Section: B Empirical Verification Of Lognormal Model For Eesmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 One can, therefore, see that it is quite a challenge to analyze the performance of next generation OFDM systems, such as LTE, that use a spectrally efficient combination of rate adaptation, multiple antenna techniques, and frequencydomain scheduling, and employ EESM to generate CQI feedback. Consequently, most papers that deal with scheduling, adaptation, or CQI feedback for the LTE downlink resort to simulations [9], [12]- [14]. For example, in [13], contiguous and distributed subcarrier allocations are compared by simulations, and their effects on the throughput of greedy and proportional fair (PF) schedulers is evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also proposes a suboptimal solution to handle complexity in multi-user environment. The Proportional Fair (PF) Multi-user Scheduler proposed in [33] provides superior fairness at low complexity, with modest loss of throughput.…”
Section: A Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is known that techniques such as FHSS can be used, packet scheduling in a RB is still a major challenge as it requires a multi-criteria optimization methodology. Various packet scheduling schemes are proposed in the literature including proportional fair, round robin, fair queuing, weighted fair queuing, inverse weighted queuing and inverse weighted fair queuing [2][3][4][5]. In order to create a better scheduling, focus is provided on different aspects of a channel such as number of subcarriers, number of resource blocks, quality of channel, modulation scheme used e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%