1974
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportion of Disease Caused or Prevented by a Given Exposure, Trait or Intervention1

Abstract: Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol 99: 325-332, 1974.-The structures of two epidemiologic parameters are explored. One, the "etiologic fraction." relates to markers of increased risk, and it is the proportion of disease attributable to the marker and/or to factors associated with it. The other, the "prevented fraction," is the equivalent of this for a marker of reduced risk. It is shown that both parameters depend-in different ways-on the freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
563
0
8

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 901 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
563
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the risk associated with one HPV type can be confounded by coinfection with other HPV types, we adjusted for infection with other HPV types by including type-specific HPV data as single variables in a multivariate regression model. Population attributable proportions were calculated as p c *(RR-1)/RR where p c is the proportion exposed to an HPV type among cases and RR is the type-specific relative rate adjusted for infection with other HPV types and censoring before or after 6 months of follow-up (Miettinen, 1974). Ninety-five percent CI for population attributable proportions were calculated from the standard error of the log-transformed complement of the population attributable proportions [ln(1-PAF)] (Rothman and Greenland, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the risk associated with one HPV type can be confounded by coinfection with other HPV types, we adjusted for infection with other HPV types by including type-specific HPV data as single variables in a multivariate regression model. Population attributable proportions were calculated as p c *(RR-1)/RR where p c is the proportion exposed to an HPV type among cases and RR is the type-specific relative rate adjusted for infection with other HPV types and censoring before or after 6 months of follow-up (Miettinen, 1974). Ninety-five percent CI for population attributable proportions were calculated from the standard error of the log-transformed complement of the population attributable proportions [ln(1-PAF)] (Rothman and Greenland, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population attributable fraction (PAF) was used as an index for the research. It was defined as the proportional reduction in population disease or mortality that would occur if exposure to the risk factor was reduced to an alternative exposure scenario [11] and expressed as a percentage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test whether the association of MetS with risk of CHD were significantly different between men and women we combined the 2 cohorts, and, in addition to the other covariates, adjusted for sex, and included an interaction term (sex x MetS). Population attributable fractions were calculated from equations by Miettinen [20] and Bruzzi et al [21], with 95%-CIs estimated by a variance formula proposed by Whittemore [22]. All p-values presented are two-tailed and p-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%