2019
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.039818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients

Abstract: Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis are reported to be at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), and to date, no therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing this risk. The feasibility and value of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation to prevent SCD is uncertain. Methods: We conducted the ICD2 trial (Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Dialysis Patients), a prospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, 35% (n = 7) of those who succumbed to cardiovascular causes suffered from sudden cardiac death which might be attributed to an arrhythmogenic event and is thus potentially preventable by the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (Di Lullo et al, 2016). However, a recent randomized controlled trial including dialysis patients with a LVEF ≥ 35% showed no advantage of prophylactic ICD implantation (Jukema et al, 2019). One explanation for this result might be provided by recent studies showing that fatal arrhythmias are more frequently related to bradyarrhythmias than to tachyarrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our cohort, 35% (n = 7) of those who succumbed to cardiovascular causes suffered from sudden cardiac death which might be attributed to an arrhythmogenic event and is thus potentially preventable by the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (Di Lullo et al, 2016). However, a recent randomized controlled trial including dialysis patients with a LVEF ≥ 35% showed no advantage of prophylactic ICD implantation (Jukema et al, 2019). One explanation for this result might be provided by recent studies showing that fatal arrhythmias are more frequently related to bradyarrhythmias than to tachyarrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At the same time, cardiovascular and sudden cardiac death risk stratification of end-stage renal patients is presently an important unmet clinical need. Blanket prophylaxis by implantable defibrillators does not improve survival in these patients (Jukema et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, a propensity‐matched retrospective study of 303 hemodialysis patients with HFrEF, showed no mortality benefit associated with receiving an ICD for primary prevention, with one‐year mortality rates of 43% in the ICD group as compared with 40% in the non‐ICD group 89 . The only RCT to date was stopped prematurely when the effect size calculated in an interim analysis suggested it would be futile to continue 90 . Furthermore, there are additional risks with ICD therapy in dialysis patients that are important to consider.…”
Section: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Even among patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease, the benefits of ICDs are unclear. 10,11 The recently published Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Dialysis Patients (ICD2) Study 12 is the first randomized controlled trial specifically designed to examine the efficacy of prophylactic ICD implantation in dialysis patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%