1991
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90738-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic sclerotherapy in high-risk cirrhotics selected by endoscopic criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This index was prospectively validated in a study by Prada and colleagues 20. Using the same variables the NIEC index was simplified by De Franchis and colleagues21 and shown to correlate with the original index. Further studies showed that the HVPG and intravariceal pressure were also independent predictors of first variceal haemorrhage when analysed in conjunction with the NIEC index 22…”
Section: 0 Natural History Of Varices In Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index was prospectively validated in a study by Prada and colleagues 20. Using the same variables the NIEC index was simplified by De Franchis and colleagues21 and shown to correlate with the original index. Further studies showed that the HVPG and intravariceal pressure were also independent predictors of first variceal haemorrhage when analysed in conjunction with the NIEC index 22…”
Section: 0 Natural History Of Varices In Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Reduction of PVP minimizes the risk of bleeding from varices, the likelihood of hepatic encephalopathy and problems relating to first pass uptake of drugs. 4 Reduced portal pressure also decreases intestinal venous congestion and could increase blood flow through the hepatic parenchyma and hence increase liver function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality is apparently reduced by reducing the rate of first variceal bleeds, which decreases the death rate due to variceal bleeding [26]. The more recent randomized trials have overcome the methodological problems of the earliest trials and have suggested either a benefit for prophylactic sclerotherapy [1,8,12,16,18] or no treatment effect [23,25]. The most discouraging ''Veterans Affairs'' study [24], abandoned after preliminary results, is subject to two principal criticisms: the choice of sodium tetradecyl sulfate as sclerosant when it is known to induce a high incidence of esophageal ulceration, and the minimal experience (20 sclerotherapy procedures) criterion for investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prophylactic endoscopic sclerotherapy (PES) has been investigated in several randomized controlled trials, and results have been quite contradictory. Some studies have shown remarkable benefit [8,12,13,29], and others [1,14,16,18,23,25] have shown no benefit. In one study a significantly higher bleeding rate in the sclerotherapy group was observed [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%