Prophylactic Salpingectomy for Prevention of Ovarian Cancer at the Time of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Tomasch, G; Lemmerer, M.; Oswald, S; Uranitsch, Stefan; Schauer, Christian; Schütz, Anna-Maria; Bliem, B.; Berger, Anton; Lang, P; Rosanelli, G.; Ronaghi, F.; Tschmelitsch, Jörg; Lax, Sigurd; Uranues, Selman; Tamussino, Karl

doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000695068.77197.3a

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, it remains unclear (with likely variation across provinces) if general surgeons providing this service would receive any renumeration. In the study by Tomasch et al (2020), renumeration was not available and was reported as a barrier to completing these procedures [63].…”

Section: Consentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of General Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Current Knowledge

Verhoeff,

Sorouri,

Kung

et al. 2024

Surgeries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer is performed by gynecologists. Advocates have suggested expanding its use to other surgical specialties. General surgeons are the other group to routinely perform intraperitoneal operations in women and could play a role in ovarian cancer prevention. Herein, we review the current evidence and perioperative factors requiring consideration prior to OS implementation in select general surgery cases. A systematic search was conducted for English-language studies evaluating OS during general surgery. The primary outcomes of this study were the feasibility and safety of OS during general surgery procedures. Secondary outcomes included pre-operative considerations (patient selection and the consent process), operative factors (technique and surgical specialty involvement), and post-operative factors (follow-up and management of operative complications). We evaluated 3977 studies, with 9 meeting the eligibility criteria. Few studies exist but preliminary evidence suggests relative safety, with no complication attributable to OS among 140 patients. Feasibility was reported in one study, which showed the capacity to perform OS in 98 out of 105 cholecystectomies (93.3%), while another study reported quick visualization of the fallopian tubes in >80% of cases. All patients in the included studies were undergoing elective procedures, including cholecystectomy, interval appendectomy, colorectal resection, bariatric surgery, and laparoscopic hernia repair. Studies only included patients ≥ 45 years old, and the mean age ranged from 49 to 67.5 years. Gynecologists were frequently involved during the consent and surgical procedures. OS represents a potential intervention to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. Ongoing studies evaluating the general surgeon’s understanding; the consent process; the feasibility, operative outcomes, and risks of OS; and surgeon training are required prior to consideration.

show abstract

Section: Consentmentioning

confidence: 99%