2019
DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Probiotics in Burn Patients: Risk versus Reward

Abstract: Probiotics are often used in critically ill patients to prevent antibiotic-associated complications, including Clostridium difficile colitis. However, clinical evidence of their efficacy is lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of prophylactic probiotic administration on bowel function, gut microbial diversity, and nutritional markers in adult burn patients. A retrospective cohort study was done on 108 burn patients aged 18 to 89. Patients were given >1 million colony-forming units pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fleming et al performed a retrospective study in connection with preventing potential antibiotic-associated C. difficile colitis by giving probiotics to burned patients in a critical condition. Otherwise, they found no significant difference in C. difficile infection between the control group and the intervention group [117]. Olguin et al proposed that the regular intake of prebiotics might help to increase the gastrointestinal permeability in burn patients.…”
Section: Burnsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fleming et al performed a retrospective study in connection with preventing potential antibiotic-associated C. difficile colitis by giving probiotics to burned patients in a critical condition. Otherwise, they found no significant difference in C. difficile infection between the control group and the intervention group [117]. Olguin et al proposed that the regular intake of prebiotics might help to increase the gastrointestinal permeability in burn patients.…”
Section: Burnsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The risk of CDI was not signi cantly different between the treatment and control groups in four trials (RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.73-1.70, p = 0.384, I 2 = 1.7%), but the incidence of sepsis was signi cantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group in eight trials (RR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.42, p = 0.032, I 2 = 54.4%). Subgroup analysis of sepsis incidence by trial design showed that probiotics or synbiotics had no effect on the incidence of sepsis in two cohort studies (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 0.82-2.19, p = 0.396, I 2 = 0.00%) [20,22], but lowered the incidence of sepsis in six RCTs (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.51-1.40, p = 0.023, I 2 = 61.8%). There was no difference in the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia between patients receiving probiotics or synbiotics and those receiving placebo (p > 0.05 for all).…”
Section: Incidences Of CDI Sepsis and Hospital-acquired Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All clinical trials were double-blinded except for the studies conducted by reference [3,27,28,33]. Four studies were retrospective cohort studies [15,20,22,26], and 8 were multi-center studies [5,18,19,24,32,33,39,42]. These trials were published between 2004 and 2022, with sample sizes in individual trials ranging from 19 to 2650.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no significant difference was found in the infection rate and sepsis rate of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), indicating that prophylactic probiotic supplementation in patients with burns is not related to the improvement of prognosis. It may be associated with an increased incidence of diarrhoea and malabsorption ( Fleming et al., 2019 ). Therefore, the effect of probiotic supplementation in patients with severe burn needs to be further studied to understand the mechanism of microbiota as a target for treatment.…”
Section: Strategies and Potential Of Microbial Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%