2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012745.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing non-cardiac surgery or invasive procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[139][140][141][142][143][144][145] A recent Cochrane review concluded that there is uncertainty about the utility and safety of prophylactic FFP use. 146 Thus, use of FFP is rarely indicated.…”
Section: Coagulation Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[139][140][141][142][143][144][145] A recent Cochrane review concluded that there is uncertainty about the utility and safety of prophylactic FFP use. 146 Thus, use of FFP is rarely indicated.…”
Section: Coagulation Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical significance of a spontaneously increased PT-INR in a non-bleeding critical care patient is unclear [ 25 ]. Further, many patients with a spontaneously increased PT-INR receive prophylactic treatment with plasma before an invasive procedure, but with low evidence [ 5 , 6 ]. Even though PT-INR can be normalized, the haemostatic balance measured with thrombin generation and thromboelastography is usually not normalized [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current evidence is limited regarding the effect of intravenous vitamin K on standard coagulation assays in critically ill patients, and it is not clear which dose and administration interval should be used. Furthermore, patients with mild coagulopathy are often given prophylactic plasma before invasive procedures albeit low evidence and risks associated with transfusion [ 5 , 6 ]. Vitamin K might be a preferable option in this setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More important, FFP can lead to circulating volume overload, which may increase bleeding risk by increasing portal and central venous pressure. Given the poor evidence that FFP is clinically effective in prophylactic and treatment settings, 23,24 a search for alternative prohemostatic options would be wise. Our data suggest PCCs to be effective in improving hemostatic capacity during HPB surgery, although the exaggerated responses in our in vitro test may warrant careful dosing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More important, FFP can lead to circulating volume overload, which may increase bleeding risk by increasing portal and central venous pressure. Given the poor evidence that FFP is clinically effective in prophylactic and treatment settings,23,24 a search for alternative prohemostatic options would be wise. Our data F I G U R E 5 Absolute ETP levels from thrombomodulin modified thrombin generation testing in plasma of controls, and patients after PPPD before (−) and after (+) in vitro addition of prohemostatic agents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%