2004
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004929
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
35
12
7
2

Citation Types

2
44
1
1

Year Published

Range
2006
2006
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
51
2
1
1

Relationship

0
55

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 55 publications

(48 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

2
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Detailed analysis of compliance with the intended ERAS protocol showed significant differences between the two groups for three items only; we found a higher rate of epidurals and prophylactic nasogastric tubes in the right colectomy group but a lower tolerance of oral supplements on POD 1. In line with the findings of Nelson et al [35], our results confirm that prophylactic nasogastric drainage-nasogastric tube inserted in operating room and left in place in the postoperative phase-does not prevent ileus. The use of epidurals for colorectal surgery remains controversial, especially for laparoscopic resections.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%