2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.14_suppl.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic growth factor (GF) support with adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) for node-negative breast cancer (BC): An interim safety analysis of the GEICAM 9805 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would result in a further increase in up-front drug costs but a reduced rate of hospitalizations due to febrile neutropenia for the TAC strategy. In this alternate model the rate of febrile neutropenia for adjuvant TAC patients was decreased from 24.7% to 3.5% [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would result in a further increase in up-front drug costs but a reduced rate of hospitalizations due to febrile neutropenia for the TAC strategy. In this alternate model the rate of febrile neutropenia for adjuvant TAC patients was decreased from 24.7% to 3.5% [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), the FN proportion for each regimen is estimated as approximately 10% for EC (AC) (16); 20% for TC (17,18), FEC (19), DOC (20) and TCbH (21); and 30% for TAC (22) at the adjuvant setting in Japanese patients. When the true proportion is 10 or 20%, the necessary number of cases is 165 or 264 to achieve an admissible 95% CI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for docetaxel-doxorubicin combinations does not fully match the current American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, which establish a threshold of 40% neutropenic fever rate, and the prescribing information for docetaxel does not specify the use of G-CSF. However, we believe that the reported incidence of 25% would in fact justify such routine use.…”
Section: Life-threatening Complications From Doxorubicin-docetaxel Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the addition of prophylactic G-CSF in the GEICAM trial, the rate of febrile neutropenia associated with the docetaxel-doxorubicincyclophosphamide regimen fell below 10%. 2 The controversial use of prophylactic antibiotics, favoring the emergence of resistant bacteria without lowering the risk of death, 3 did not achieve this level of protection, as found in the NSABP, GEICAM, BCIRG, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trials. It may, however, explain the lower rate of febrile neutropenia in these studies as compared with ours, which did not include prophylactic antibiotic use (around 25% vs 41%).…”
Section: Life-threatening Complications From Doxorubicin-docetaxel Chmentioning
confidence: 99%