Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide–spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

Motivation: Complex patterns of protein phosphorylation mediate many cellular processes. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a powerful tool for identifying these post-translational modifications. In high-throughput experiments, mass spectrometry database search engines, such as MASCOT provide a ranked list of peptide identifications based on hundreds of thousands of MS/MS spectra obtained in a mass spectrometry experiment. These search results are not in themselves sufficient for confident assignment of phosphorylation sites as identification of characteristic mass differences requires time-consuming manual assessment of the spectra by an experienced analyst. The time required for manual assessment has previously rendered high-throughput confident assignment of phosphorylation sites challenging.Results: We have developed a knowledge base of criteria, which replicate expert assessment, allowing more than half of cases to be automatically validated and site assignments verified with a high degree of confidence. This was assessed by comparing automated spectral interpretation with careful manual examination of the assignments for 501 peptides above the 1% false discovery rate (FDR) threshold corresponding to 259 putative phosphorylation sites in 74 proteins of the Trypanosoma brucei proteome. Despite this stringent approach, we are able to validate 80 of the 91 phosphorylation sites (88%) positively identified by manual examination of the spectra used for the MASCOT searches with a FDR < 15%.Conclusions:High-throughput computational analysis can provide a viable second stage validation of primary mass spectrometry database search results. Such validation gives rapid access to a systems level overview of protein phosphorylation in the experiment under investigation.Availability: A GPL licensed software implementation in Perl for analysis and spectrum annotation is available in the supplementary material and a web server can be assessed online at http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/prophossiContact: d.m.a.martin@dundee.ac.ukSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Selective chemoprecipitation to enrich nitropeptides from complex proteomes for mass-spectrometric analysis

“…Although no rules have been established for the fragmentation of dimethylated and tagged 3AT-containing peptide sequences, several can be adapted from those applied to automated expert validation of phosphopeptide MS/MS-spectrum matches (ProPhosSI) 55 :…”

Perspectives of Comprehensive Phosphoproteome Analysis Using Shotgun Strategy

“…The first type is "automating expert validation" based methods, which simulate the approach for manual interpretation of phosphopeptide MS 2 spectra. 44 The basic concept of these methods is the selection of appropriate features and corresponding criteria. Since most of the phosphopeptides could generate neutral loss during CID fragmentation, the phosphate neutral loss in MS 2 spectrum can be used as a unique feature to confirm the presence of the phosphopeptides.…”

Computer aided manual validation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data

“…More recently, a hybrid Support Vector Machine (SVM)/Dynamic Bayes Network (DBN) approach was used to classify MS/MS data, and was shown to increase positive identifications in 1% FDR search results [8]. To circumvent the need for large amounts of training data for classification methods, another approach is to create a rule-based framework where prominent fragments are predicted based on expert criteria [9], although codifying experiential human knowledge still limits results to those peptides that match prescribed criteria, therefore hindering generalization to peptides with different PTM’s. The “expect” score in MASCOT provides another, peptide sequence specific, alternative to the FDR.…”