2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1479244320000190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophet of a Partitioned World: Ferdinand Fried, “Great Spaces,” and the Dialectics of Deglobalization, 1929–1950

Abstract: Historical scholarship on “great spaces,” a central concept in the political thought of Nazi Germany, has previously focused on legal debates while neglecting important economic contexts. The journalist Ferdinand Fried deserves to be considered one of the major economic theorists of “great spaces” in the Weimar, Nazi, and early postwar eras. Fried argued that the world economy was inexorably passing from globalization through economic nationalism to a reconstituted “world economy of great spaces.” Deglobalizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, we suggest that globalization and deglobalization may coexist or alternate in dialectical dynamics (Karunaratne, 2012; Kornprobst & Paul, 2021; Olwig, 2003; Teo, 2023). This pluralistic, nonlinear framework also enables us to recognize that some forms of deglobalization had taken place in the past, and their existence should not be denied when they later gave way to a new cycle of globalization (Casey, 2018; Chase-Dunn et al, 2006; Derman, 2021; Van Bergeijk, 2019). Most importantly, within this ontology, we can position ourselves within a “history in the making” instead of at “the end of history.” In so doing, we can take a proactive approach to the analysis of rapidly emerging psychosocial challenges.…”
Section: Debating the Relevance Of “Deglobalization”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we suggest that globalization and deglobalization may coexist or alternate in dialectical dynamics (Karunaratne, 2012; Kornprobst & Paul, 2021; Olwig, 2003; Teo, 2023). This pluralistic, nonlinear framework also enables us to recognize that some forms of deglobalization had taken place in the past, and their existence should not be denied when they later gave way to a new cycle of globalization (Casey, 2018; Chase-Dunn et al, 2006; Derman, 2021; Van Bergeijk, 2019). Most importantly, within this ontology, we can position ourselves within a “history in the making” instead of at “the end of history.” In so doing, we can take a proactive approach to the analysis of rapidly emerging psychosocial challenges.…”
Section: Debating the Relevance Of “Deglobalization”mentioning
confidence: 99%