1976
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.18.3.950-955.1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophage induction and inactivation by UV light

Abstract: Analysis of the induction curves for UV light-irradiated Haemophilus influenzae lysogens and the distribution of pyrimidine dimers in a repair-deficient lysogen suggests that one dimer per prophage-size segment of the host bacterial chromosome is necessary as a preinduction event. The close correlations obtained prompted a renewed consideration of the possibility that direct prophage induction occurs when one dimer is stabilized within the prophage genome. The host excision-repair system apparently functions t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the laboratory, the most commonly used method for induction is Mitomycin C (see protocol Raya & H’bert, 2009 ). Other common laboratory techniques include UV (e.g., Barnhart, Cox & Jett, 1976 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ), antibiotics (e.g., Shaikh & Tarr, 2003 ; Goerke, Köller & Wolz, 2006 ; Loś et al, 2009 ), and H 2 O 2 (e.g., Figueroa-Bossi & Bossi, 1999 ; Martín et al, 2009 ; Loś et al, 2009 ; Loś et al, 2010 ). A few studies have also employed changes in temperature (e.g., Kirby, Jacob & Goldthwait, 1967 ; Meijer et al, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Chu et al, 2011 ), nutrient availability (e.g., Wilson, Turner & Mann, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Williamson & Paul, 2006 ; Zeaki, Rådström & Schelin, 2015 ), and pH (e.g., Meijer et al, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Wallin-Carlquist et al, 2010 ; Choi, Kotay & Goel, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laboratory, the most commonly used method for induction is Mitomycin C (see protocol Raya & H’bert, 2009 ). Other common laboratory techniques include UV (e.g., Barnhart, Cox & Jett, 1976 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ), antibiotics (e.g., Shaikh & Tarr, 2003 ; Goerke, Köller & Wolz, 2006 ; Loś et al, 2009 ), and H 2 O 2 (e.g., Figueroa-Bossi & Bossi, 1999 ; Martín et al, 2009 ; Loś et al, 2009 ; Loś et al, 2010 ). A few studies have also employed changes in temperature (e.g., Kirby, Jacob & Goldthwait, 1967 ; Meijer et al, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Chu et al, 2011 ), nutrient availability (e.g., Wilson, Turner & Mann, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Williamson & Paul, 2006 ; Zeaki, Rådström & Schelin, 2015 ), and pH (e.g., Meijer et al, 1998 ; Lunde et al, 2005 ; Wallin-Carlquist et al, 2010 ; Choi, Kotay & Goel, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One wild-type (WT) phage from each source bacterium, 42argF and 52S, was isolated from each spot plaque by further plaque purification. Although not all prophages are inducible by mitomycin C, the methods for validation are well suited to work with any number of alternative induction strategies, including pH and temperature shifts, UV induction, spontaneous induction, and chemical induction ( 19 22 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no. CA34.1) Petri dishes, sterile Bacterial incubator Tabletop centrifuge and microcentrifuge 50-ml conical polypropylene tubes (e.g., BD Falcon) Additional reagents and equipment for titering bacteria (Basic Protocol 1) and phage (UNIT 4.4) Prophage induction by UV-light irradiation (Baluch and Sussman, 1978) By dosing bacteria with ultraviolet light, DNA is damaged and prophages are excised due to the formation of pyrimidine dimers (Takebe et al, 1967;Barnhart et al, 1976). After treatment with UV light followed by a period of outgrowth for phage release, determine whether phages have been induced by titering the supernatants on a phage-free (nonlysogenized) reporter strain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%