Property Rights Violations as a Structural Driver of Women’s HIV Risks: A Qualitative Study in Nyanza and Western Provinces, Kenya

Abstract

While access to and control over assets can minimize women’s HIV risk, little is known about the processes through which property rights violations increase the sexual transmission of HIV. The current study focused on two rural areas in Nyanza and Western Province, Kenya where HIV prevalence was high (23.8–33 %) and property rights violations were common. The current work drew on in-depth interview data collected from 50 individuals involved in the development and implementation of a community-led land and property rights program. The program was designed to respond to property rights violations, prevent disinheritance and asset stripping, and reduce HIV risk among women. In our findings, we detailed the social and economic mechanisms through which a loss of property rights was perceived to influence primary and secondary prevention of HIV. These included: loss of income, loss of livelihood and shelter, and migration to slums, markets, or beaches where the exchange of sex for food, money, shelter, clothing, or other goods was common. We also examined the perceived influence of cultural practices, such as wife inheritance, on HIV risk. In the conclusions, we made recommendations for future research in the science-base focused on the development of property ownership as a structural HIV prevention and treatment intervention.

Power and the association with relationship quality in South African couples: Implications for HIV/AIDS interventions

“…However, an overemphasis on female vulnerability masks how variability in socio-cultural contexts influences both women’s and men’s risk for HIV/AIDS (Higgins et al, 2010). This has led researchers to question the effectiveness of empowerment interventions such as microfinance (Dworkin & Blankenship, 2009), calling for more research to understand masculinity and men’s responses to women’s increasing power (Dworkin et al, 2013a; Dworkin et al, 2009). …”

Gender-Specific Risk Factors for Virologic Failure in KwaZulu-Natal: Automobile Ownership and Financial Insecurity

“…Some of these factors may have a greater impact among specific subpopulations, defined by gender, age, or socioeconomic status (20). For example, women in traditionally patriarchal societies, who often lack access to personal financial or productive resources (33, 34), may be greatly impacted by financial insecurity (18, 35, 36). Conversely, men greatly affected by cultural expectations to be strong and provide for family may find employment a greater barrier to accessing care when they cannot get time away from work to attend clinic due to lost wages or fear of losing their job by revealing their HIV status (37–40).…”

Transactional Fish-for-Sex Relationships Amid Declining Fish Access in Kenya

“…This has been branded a key factor in the spread of HIV and broadly discouraged. Yet, with appreciation of the role of resources, particularly property rights, widows who are not inherited are now recognized to be at risk of losing rights to land and property, resulting in migration and subsequent vulnerability to HIV (Camlin et al, 2014;Dworkin et al, 2013). The repudiation of widow inheritance does not have simple or summarily beneficial consequences, and, we suggest, much the same can be expected from treatment of jaboya relationships where participants may balance risks of HIV infection with persistent food insecurity and environmental and economic change.…”