2006
DOI: 10.2111/05-173r1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property Rights Orientations and Rangeland Management Objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of benefits and burdens has been explored in great detail with numerous case studies. This is true even inside conservation literature, because we know the importance of landowner incentives and compensation schemes (see Farrier 1995, Brook et al 2003, Kreuter et al 2006, Muradian et al 2013). However, we know much less about the perceived fairness of conservation policy (Olive 2014, Pascual et al 2014 and even less about the importance of landowner recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of benefits and burdens has been explored in great detail with numerous case studies. This is true even inside conservation literature, because we know the importance of landowner incentives and compensation schemes (see Farrier 1995, Brook et al 2003, Kreuter et al 2006, Muradian et al 2013). However, we know much less about the perceived fairness of conservation policy (Olive 2014, Pascual et al 2014 and even less about the importance of landowner recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that empirical studies indicate that many landowners think ESA policy is unfair to them as landowners and citizens, at least from a distributive justice standpoint. Kreuter et al (2006), for example, found that landowners in Colorado, Texas, and Utah generally disagreed with the notion that landowners should protect endangered species habitat without compensation from the public. Similarly, Brook et al (2003Brook et al ( :1641 found a positive correlation between landowners who thought they should not "bear financial responsibility" for conservation and those indicating that they managed their properties to minimize the chance of an endangered species occupying it.…”
Section: Environmental Justice and The Esasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on rangeland conservation has focused on the microlevel factors that influence the individual decisions of landowners, including how land-ownership motivations influence willingness to participate in conservation practices , landowner attitudes and goals (Morton et al 2010), trust among members of cooperative land management groups (Toledo et al 2014), and perceptions of risk (Kreuter et al 2008, Toledo et al 2013, which have all been related to a landowner's willingness to engage in rangeland conservation practices. In addition, feelings of social responsibility and property rights orientations have been connected to landowner decision-making with regard to adopting conservation practices (Kreuter et al 2006). Lastly, cultural and lifestyle motivations are widely recognized to be more important than economic motivations (Gentner and Tanaka 2002, Torell et al 2001, Brunson and Huntsinger 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social networks are key in disseminating new information and facilitating adoption of innovations (Brodt et al, 2004;Didier and Brunson, 2004;Farmar-Bowers and Lane, 2009;Huntsinger and Hopkinson, 1996;Kreuter et al, 2006;Lubell and Fulton, 2008;Lubell et al, 2013;Marshall et al, 2011). Formal and informal education can affect issue awareness, which may ultimately alter the range of decisions available to an individual (Kurz, 2002).…”
Section: Information Sources and Social Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal attitudes and values are often argued to shape beliefs and, ultimately, individual decisions and adoption of management goals and practices (Brodt et al, 2004;Brunson and Burritt, 2009;Didier and Brunson, 2004;Farmar-Bowers and Lane, 2009;Kreuter et al, 2006;Lubell, 2007;Lubell et al, 2013;Marshall et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2007). We collected responses to a number of personal attitude statements, using a 1 to 5 scale that ranged from "fully disagree" to "fully agree" (Table 1).…”
Section: Operator Attitudes and Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%