2005
DOI: 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property Rights and Investment in Urban Slums

Abstract: This paper examines the effect of changes in tenure security on residential investment in urban squatter neighborhoods. To address the endogeneity of property rights, I make use of variation in ownership status induced by a nation-wide titling program in Peru. In a difference-in-difference analysis, I compare the change in housing investment before and after the program among participating households to the change in investment among two samples of non-participants. My results indicate that strengthening prope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legal titling also tends to generate land grievances because formalization of land ownership is inherently redistributive (Boone, 2013). In addition, although some studies find that legal titling increases investment in land or public infrastructure (Field, 2005;Galiani and Schargrodsky, 2010), others find that people are no more likely to perceive that their land tenure is secure after the state assigns them a legal title (Benjaminsen et al, 2009;Brasselle et al, 2002;Bromley, 2009;Bromley, 2000, 1997).…”
Section: Legal Titling Cblar and Household Tenure Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal titling also tends to generate land grievances because formalization of land ownership is inherently redistributive (Boone, 2013). In addition, although some studies find that legal titling increases investment in land or public infrastructure (Field, 2005;Galiani and Schargrodsky, 2010), others find that people are no more likely to perceive that their land tenure is secure after the state assigns them a legal title (Benjaminsen et al, 2009;Brasselle et al, 2002;Bromley, 2009;Bromley, 2000, 1997).…”
Section: Legal Titling Cblar and Household Tenure Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here are some other examples of administrative burdens: in registering property: Simple, cheap and fast procedures of property registration lead to easier access to formal credit, increase the land value, create greater investment opportunities (Field, 2006) and provide significant bene fits for the whole economy (Deininger, 2003); in closing business: Bankruptcy procedures are also the form of administrative burden. Efficient bankruptcy procedures ensure higher probability of survival for firms in business problems while also guaranteeing higher recovery rates for creditors and hence greater ex ante credit availability (White & Berkowitz, 2004); in enforcing contracts: An excessive length of trials has a negative impact on credit availability, company´s entry and size ( Jappelli et al, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Research and Administrative Burden For Business Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In urban areas, efforts to enhance tenure security have led to increased levels of self-assessed land values (Lanjouw and Levy, 2002), greater investment in housing, and female empowerment (Field, 2005). Receipt of titles allowed former squatters, especially women, to join formal labor markets instead of staying at home to guard their land, thereby increasing their income and reducing child labor (Field, 2007).…”
Section: Linking Property Rights Interventions To Economic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%