2003
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200317217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property Distributions: Differences Between Drugs, Natural Products, and Molecules from Combinatorial Chemistry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of SlogP values shows that natural products are slightly more hydrophobic than drugs and overall have a slightly larger MW as previously observed for other collections of natural products 48, 49. Compounds in MLSMR have the same median and mean distribution of HBD as drugs and natural products (1 and 1.2, respectively) although with outliers (HBD > 10).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The distribution of SlogP values shows that natural products are slightly more hydrophobic than drugs and overall have a slightly larger MW as previously observed for other collections of natural products 48, 49. Compounds in MLSMR have the same median and mean distribution of HBD as drugs and natural products (1 and 1.2, respectively) although with outliers (HBD > 10).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Three-ring scaffolds are the most common in the version of DNP that Koch et al examined, with the counts of two and four ringed-systems lying within one standard deviation 35. Natural products have the highest average number of rings and marketed drugs the least, with natural product derivatives and combinatorially synthesized chemicals inbetween 37. Our results show generally similar trends, but much less pronounced, since we examine larger collections (except for the drugs).…”
Section: Analysis Of Some Existing Databasessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…To determine the in vitro activity of the 2-AQ natural product, a MIC analysis was performed to quantitatively measure its activity against BCC species and other GNF-GNR [13]. The MIC of 2-AQ for B. cepacia ATCC 25416 was 32 μg/ml, but it was 16 μg/ml for B. cenocepacia J2315 and B. multivorans ATCC 27616.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%